Literature DB >> 19328349

Single vertical incision for Baha implant surgery: preliminary results.

Eric P Wilkinson1, William M Luxford, William H Slattery, Antonio De la Cruz, John W House, Jose N Fayad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A single vertical skin incision with subcutaneous tissue removal is a cosmetic alternative for Baha implant placement. We aimed to determine the preliminary complication rate using a 4-cm vertical skin incision. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Vertical incision Baha implant placements from January 2006 to August 2007 were reviewed. Complications including skin irritation, skin overgrowth, and implant extrusion were tallied. A total of 71 patients underwent surgery, with a mean follow-up time of 7 months.
RESULTS: There were five minor complications (three cases of skin irritation, one wound infection requiring oral antibiotics, one postoperative hematoma) and seven major complications (one case of irritation requiring abutment removal, six cases of skin overgrowth or infection requiring flap revision), for a total complication rate of 16.9 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: A single vertical incision for Baha implant placement has a complication rate similar to that of traditional dermatome use in this preliminary study. Patients with thick scalps or risk factors for hypertrophic scarring may require longer abutments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19328349     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.

Authors:  Shwan Mohamad; Imran Khan; S Y Hey; S S Musheer Hussain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Switching from a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone anchored hearing system: the utility of the fascia temporalis superficialis pedicled flap in case of skin intolerance.

Authors:  A Devèze; S Rossetto; R Meller; M Sanjuan Puchol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Modified Baha Punch Technique: Least Invasive, Shortest Time and No Suturing.

Authors:  Hassan Alshehri; Abdulrahman Alsanosi; Osama Majdalawieh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-12

4.  Clobetasol's Influence on the Management and Cost of Skin Overgrowth Associated with the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Douglas M Hildrew; Jesse A Guittard; John M Carter; Timothy B Molony
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

5.  A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation.

Authors:  Mark W Steehler; Sean P Larner; Joshua S Mintz; Matthew K Steehler; Sidney P Lipman; Shane Griffith
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-18

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Preservation Surgery With Hydroxyapatite-Coated Abutments Compared to Traditional Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant Surgery-A Pragmatic Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  M van Hoof; S Wigren; J Ivarsson Blechert; M A Joore; D J M Mateijsen; S J H Bom; J Stalfors; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; O Deguine; A J M van der Rijt; M C Flynn; J Marco Algarra; R J Stokroos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-03-05

7.  Retrospective analysis of skin complications related to bone-anchored hearing aid implant: association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit.

Authors:  Daniel Peñaranda; Juan Manuel Garcia; Maria Leonor Aparicio; Felipe Montes; Clemencia Barón; Roberto C Jiménez; Augusto Peñaranda
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.