Literature DB >> 19326482

Classification system for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Lisa David1, Steven Glazier, Jeremy Pyle, James Thompson, Louis Argenta.   

Abstract

Scaphocephaly is an important but incompletely defined entity resulting from premature fusion of the sagittal suture. Our goal was to use the clarity afforded by three-dimensional computed tomographies (CTs) to discern what characteristics of this disease are most representative and singular. Furthermore, we sought to define a classification system wherein the dominant physical trait, as it results from varied sites of premature fusion, determines the type of scaphocephaly in a particular patient. All patients with CT-diagnosed isolated single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis seen by a single craniofacial surgeon and a single pediatric neurosurgeon over a 5-year period are included (N = 76). Patients were stratified into anterior, central, posterior, or complex subtypes dependent upon the presence of a single dominant characteristic as seen on CT scan. Anterior type features a transverse retrocoronal band; central type has a heaped sagittal ridge; posterior type has an especially prominent occiput; and complex type includes those patients in whom a single dominant feature is not present. Forty-eight patients fit into anterior, central, or posterior types. Thirteen percent (N = 7) lack a single dominant feature and are complex. Incidence and prevalence for each type in this population are the following: anterior, 13/24%; central, 16/29%; posterior, 19/35%; and complex, 7/13%. Heterogeneous points of initial fusion may be responsible for the differing representations. Clinical applications using this classification system are ongoing and may allow us to individualize surgical intervention to optimize clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19326482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  9 in total

Review 1.  Isolated sagittal craniosynostosis: definition, classification, and surgical indications.

Authors:  Luca Massimi; Massimo Caldarelli; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Giovanna Paternoster; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Objective classification system for sagittal craniosynostosis based on suture segmentation.

Authors:  Xiaohua Qian; Hua Tan; Jian Zhang; Xiahai Zhuang; Leslie Branch; Chaire Sanger; Allison Thompson; Weiling Zhao; King Chuen Li; Lisa David; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Length of synostosis and segmented intracranial volume correlate with age in patients with non-syndromic sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Arja Heliövaara; Junnu Leikola; Virve Koljonen; Pia Vuola; Mika Koivikko
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Craniosynostosis: imaging review and primer on computed tomography.

Authors:  Chaitra A Badve; Mallikarjunappa M K; Ramesh S Iyer; Gisele E Ishak; Paritosh C Khanna
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02

5.  Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in development and skeletal diseases.

Authors:  Chad M Teven; Evan M Farina; Jane Rivas; Russell R Reid
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Automated Sagittal Craniosynostosis Classification from CT Images Using Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Lei You; Guangming Zhang; Weiling Zhao; Matthew Greives R; Lisa David; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Clin Surg       Date:  2020-02-27

7.  Multi-directional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis for Treating Sagittal Synostosis with Frontometaphyseal Dysplasia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yuya Morishita; Ataru Sunaga; Akira Gomi; Alice Hatade; Yuhei Morita; Kotaro Yoshimura
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-23

8.  New method for quantification of severity of isolated scaphocephaly linked to intracranial volume.

Authors:  Otto D M Kronig; Sophia A J Kronig; Léon N A Van Adrichem
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Cranial sutures work collectively to distribute strain throughout the reptile skull.

Authors:  Neil Curtis; M E H Jones; S E Evans; P O'Higgins; M J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.118

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.