| Literature DB >> 19325773 |
Rafael C Dutra1, Magda N Leite2, Nádia R Barbosa1.
Abstract
In the present study the phenolic (Folin-Dennis) and flavonoid (colorimetric assay) constituents and the antioxidant activity of Pterodon emarginatus seeds were investigated in several samples prepared with different extraction procedures: essential oil (EO) using a Clevenger-type apparatus; hexanic (HF), ethyl acetate (EAF), buthanolic (BF) and methanolic (MF) fractions using Soxhlet extraction, and extracts (1 g/extract) obtained from different methods: reflux 80 degrees C/30 min, ultrasound/30 min, static maceration/48 h and heating plate 100 degrees C/45 min. These extracts were prepared using water or ethanol/water at 30:70 v/v, 50:50 v/v or 70:30 v/v. Antioxidant activity [2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH)] was tested only in the fractions obtained from Soxhlet extraction. The extract obtained from reflux using ethanol/water (70:30, v/v) showed the highest phenolic constituents level. The EAF, BF and MF showed DPPH scavenging activities with IC(50)=163.22, 18.89 and 10.15 microg/ml, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH; Leguminosae; Pterodon emarginatus; phenolic constituents
Year: 2008 PMID: 19325773 PMCID: PMC2635688 DOI: 10.3390/ijms9040606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Phenolic constituents of P. emarginatus seeds submitted the different processes of extraction#.
| Water | Ethanol/water (30:70, v/v)1 | Ethanol/water (50:50, v/v) | Ethanol/water (70:30, v/v)2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reflux a | ND | 5.20 ± 0.25 | 600.30 ± 2.51 | 852.60 ± 2.51 |
| Maceration | ND | ND | ND | 501.00 ± 1.73 |
| Ultrasound | ND | ND | ND | 603.00 ± 2.08 |
| Plate of heating b | 113.00 ± 1.00 | 332.60 ± 2.51 | 536.30 ± 1.52 | 781.60 ± 1.52 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). Statistical significance was calculated by ANOVA followed by Tukey test. Letters indicate statistical differences between lines. Numbers indicate statistical differences between columns. a, b, 1, 2 all methods show statistical differences.
Flavonoids levels of P. emarginatus seeds submitted to the different processes of extraction[#].
| Water6 | Ethanol/water (30:70, v/v)1 | Ethanol/water (50:50, v/v) | Ethanol/water (70:30, v/v) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reflux | 132.00 ± 1.00 | 122.00 ± 2.00 | 106.06 ± 3.05b,2 | 120.30 ± 1 53a,4 |
| Maceration | 110.00 ± 1.00 | 103.30 ± 2.3 | 110.60 ± 1.15d,2 | 123.00 ± 1.73 |
| Ultrasound | 101.70 ± 1.53 | 92.60 ± 2.5 | 96.30 ± 1.53 | 131.30 ± 1.53 |
| Plate of heating | 68.00 ± 1.00 | 67.00 ± 1.00 | 73.70 ± 1.15g, 3 | 68.00 ± 1.00 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n=3). Statistical significance was calculated by ANOVA followed by Tukey test. Letters indicate statistical differences between lines. Numbers indicate statistical differences between columns.
p<0.05 compared to water and ethanol/water (50:50, v/v);
p<0.05 compared to water;
p<0.05 compared to water, ethanol/water (50:50, v/v) and ethanol/water (70:30, v/v);
p<0.05 compared to ethanol/water (30: 70, v/v) and ethanol/water (70:30, v/v);
p<0.05 compared to water and ethanol/water (70:30, v/v);
p<0.05 compared to ethanol/water (70:30, v/v);
p<0.05 compared to water, ethanol/water (30:70, v/v) and ethanol/water (70:30, v/v);
all methods show statistical differences;
p<0.05 compared to ultrasound and plate of heating;
p<0.05 compared to ultrasound, maceration and reflux;
p<0.05 compared to ultrasound and plate of heating;
p<0.05 compared to ultrasound, maceration and reflux.