Literature DB >> 19324509

A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease.

Mary Ann Murray1, Gillian Brunier, Jenny Oey Chung, Lee Ann Craig, Cynthia Mills, Alison Thomas, Dawn Stacey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing patient involvement in decision-making in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and effective interventions to support their decision-making needs.
METHODS: A systematic review included studies and decision support tools that involved: (1) adults with CKD, (2) studies published from 1998-2008; and (3) a focus on patient decision-making needs, and/or barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making. Studies were quality appraised.
RESULTS: Forty studies were appraised. These studies mainly focused on the decisions patients with CKD faced around the choice of renal replacement therapy and withholding/withdrawing dialysis. Moreover, studies typically focused on health care professional's provision of information about the decision rather than identifying decisional conflict and supporting patients in decision-making. No studies were found that identified the patient's point of view about factors that might influence or inhibit quality decision-making. Factors influencing CKD patient's participation in decision included: (1) interpersonal relationships; (2) preservation of current well being, normality and quality of life; (3) need for control; and (4) personal importance on benefits and risks. Of the four patient decision aids identified, none had been evaluated for effectiveness.
CONCLUSION: Patients with CKD face decisions that are likely to cause decisional conflict. Most studies focused on information needs related to renal replacement therapy and withdrawing or withholding dialysis. There was less focus on other decision-making needs in the context of those choices and across the trajectory of CKD. Although patient decision aids and implementation of shared decision-making have been evaluated in patients with other medical conditions, little is known about interventions to support patients with CKD making quality decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients with CKD have decision-making needs across the trajectory of their illness. Although little is known about supporting patients with CKD decision-making, support could be provided with protocols and tools that have been developed for other chronic illness situations. Development of CKD-specific clinical practice guidelines that include decision support best practices could benefit CKD patients. Research priorities include development and evaluation of CKD focused decision support tools and processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324509     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  48 in total

1.  Differences between dialysis modality selection and initiation.

Authors:  Scott E Liebman; David A Bushinsky; James G Dolan; Peter Veazie
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  The Ethics of Chronic Dialysis for the Older Patient: Time to Reevaluate the Norms.

Authors:  Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Keith M Swetz; Robert C Albright
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Considerations in starting a patient with advanced frailty on dialysis: complex biology meets challenging ethics.

Authors:  Mark Swidler
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Exploring the Relationship Between Patient Activation, Treatment Satisfaction, and Decisional Conflict in Patients Approaching End-Stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  Miriam Vélez-Bermúdez; Alan J Christensen; Ellen M Kinner; Anne I Roche; Mony Fraer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-08-16

5.  Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ellen Rygh; Eli Arild; Elin Johnsen; Markus Rumpsfeld
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa Tlach; Caroline Wüsten; Anne Daubmann; Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Patient and health care professional decision-making to commence and withdraw from renal dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Jamilla A Hussain; Kate Flemming; Fliss E M Murtagh; Miriam J Johnson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Views of Japanese patients on the advantages and disadvantages of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Nanako Nakamura-Taira; Yoshimi Muranaka; Masako Miwa; Seikon Kin; Kei Hirai
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Discussing Conservative Management With Older Patients With CKD: An Interview Study of Nephrologists.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Renuka Pandya; Allison Kannam; Rohini Loke; Tira Oskoui; Ronald D Perrone; Klemens B Meyer; Daniel E Weiner; John B Wong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context.

Authors:  Anna Winterbottom; Hilary L Bekker; Mark Conner; Andrew Mooney
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.