Literature DB >> 22429705

Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: a qualitative study.

Ellen Rygh1, Eli Arild, Elin Johnsen, Markus Rumpsfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines the patients' need for information and guidance in the selection of dialysis modality, and in establishing and practicing home dialysis. The study focuses on patients' experiences living with home dialysis, how they master the treatment, and their views on how to optimize communication with health services and the potential of telemedicine.
METHODS: We used an inductive research strategy and conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven patients established in home dialysis. Our focus was the patients' experiences with home dialysis, and our theoretical reference was patients' empowerment through telemedicine solutions. Three informants had home haemodialysis (HHD); eight had peritoneal dialysis (PD), of which three had automated peritoneal dialysis (APD); and five had continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The material comprises all PD-patients in the catchment area capable of being interviewed, and all known HHD-users in Norway at that time.
RESULTS: All of the interviewees were satisfied with their choice of home dialysis, and many experienced a normalization of daily life, less dominated by disease. They exhibited considerable self-management skills and did not perceive themselves as ill, but still required very close contact with the hospital staff for communication and follow-up. When choosing a dialysis modality, other patients' experiences were often more influential than advice from specialists. Information concerning the possibility of having HHD, including knowledge of how to access it, was not easily available. Especially those with dialysis machines, both APD and HHD, saw a potential for telemedicine solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: As home dialysis may contribute to a normalization of life less dominated by disease, the treatment should be organized so that the potential for home dialysis can be fully exploited. Pre-dialysis information should be unbiased and include access to other patients' experiences. Telemedicine may potentially facilitate a communication-based follow-up and improve safety within the home setting, making it easier to choose and live with home dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429705      PMCID: PMC3355039          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Nephrol        ISSN: 1471-2369            Impact factor:   2.388


  25 in total

Review 1.  Frequent prolonged home haemodialysis: three old concepts, one modern solution.

Authors:  Menno P Kooistra
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board.

Authors:  Adrian Covic; Bert Bammens; Thierry Lobbedez; Liviu Segall; Olof Heimbürger; Wim van Biesen; Denis Fouque; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making.

Authors:  Alvin H Moss
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Daily hemodialysis 2006. State of the art.

Authors:  A Pierratos; P McFarlane; C T Chan; S Kwok; G Nesrallah
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  [A renaissance for home hemodialysis?].

Authors:  Hallvard Holdaas; Lars Westlie
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2006-11-02

6.  Remote monitoring in nocturnal home hemodialysis 2003.

Authors:  Christopher Hoy
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 1.812

7.  A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai; Sally C Morton; Carol M Mangione; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 8.  Systematic review of the effectiveness of home versus hospital or satellite unit hemodialysis for people with end-stage renal failure.

Authors:  Graham Mowatt; Luke Vale; Alison MacLeod
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Partnering with patients to improve peritonitis rates.

Authors:  Sharon White; Angela Vinet
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2009

10.  Telemedicine system for patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Hidetomo Nakamoto
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Role of telehealth in renal replacement therapy education.

Authors:  Anna Malkina; Delphine S Tuot
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Perspectives from the Kidney Health Initiative on Advancing Technologies to Facilitate Remote Monitoring of Patient Self-Care in RRT.

Authors:  Mitchell H Rosner; Susie Q Lew; Paul Conway; Jennifer Ehrlich; Robert Jarrin; Uptal D Patel; Karen Rheuban; R Brooks Robey; Neal Sikka; Eric Wallace; Patrick Brophy; James Sloand
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  A Syllabus for Teaching Peritoneal Dialysis to Patients and Caregivers.

Authors:  Ana E Figueiredo; Judith Bernardini; Elaine Bowes; Miki Hiramatsu; Valerie Price; Chunyan Su; Rachael Walker; Gillian Brunier
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Telemedicine and Remote Monitoring: Supporting the Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  K S Nayak; Claudio Ronco; Akash Nayak Karopadi; Mitchell H Rosner
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Quality of life in end stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  Veena D Joshi
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

6.  Challenges, Facilitators, and Recommendations for Implementation of Home Dialysis in the Veterans Health Administration: Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions.

Authors:  Lindsey A Jones; Elisa J Gordon; Timothy P Hogan; Cindi A Fiandaca; Bridget M Smith; Kevin T Stroupe; Michael J Fischer
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-09-22

7.  Geographic disparities in mortality among the end stage renal disease patients: an analysis of the United States Renal Data System, 2007-08.

Authors:  Fozia Ajmal; Kevin J Bennett; Janice C Probst
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.902

8.  Development and Content Validity of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Home Dialysis.

Authors:  Matthew B Rivara; Todd Edwards; Donald Patrick; Lisa Anderson; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Meaning of empowerment in peritoneal dialysis: focus groups with patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Amanda Baumgart; Karine E Manera; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Jenny I Shen; Lorena Ruiz; Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Terence Yip; Samuel K S Fung; Matthew Tong; Achilles Lee; Yeoungjee Cho; Andrea K Viecelli; Benedicte Sautenet; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Edwina A Brown; Gillian Brunier; Jie Dong; Nicole Scholes-Robertson; Tony Dunning; Rajnish Mehrotra; Saraladevi Naicker; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Jeffrey Perl; Martin Wilkie; Allison Tong
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Patients' and carers' experiences of interacting with home haemodialysis technology: implications for quality and safety.

Authors:  Atish Rajkomar; Ken Farrington; Astrid Mayer; Diane Walker; Ann Blandford
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.