Literature DB >> 19322578

Comparison of acquired cholesteatoma between pediatric and adult patients.

Cristina de Carvalho Dornelles1, Sady Selaimen da Costa, Luíse Meurer, Letícia Petersen Schmidt Rosito, Andrei Roberto da Silva, Sabrina Lima Alves.   

Abstract

The quantification of angiogenesis and metalloproteinases may be useful in cholesteatoma behavior assessment as markers of its aggressiveness. The objective of this study is to compare markers CD31, MMP2 and MMP9 in pediatric and adult patients. This study is based on cross-sectional studies of pediatric (<or=18 years old) and adult groups (>or=19 years old). Samples of 120 cholesteatomas were fixed in 10% formol, prepared on five slides of each sample through habitual histological techniques, and number of blood vessels (CD31), marking with MMP2 and MMP9, number of matrix cells and thickness at perimatrix cell were observed. Data were analyzed through SPSS using Spearman and Mann-Whitney coefficients. Cholesteatomas were equally distributed: 60 in pediatric patients (11.77 +/- 3.57 years); 60 in adult patients (38.29 +/- 14.51 years). When correlating the number of blood vessels and metalloproteinases with perimatrix thickness, we obtained the following values: pediatric CD31, 7 (4-11); adult CD31, 4 (0-10) (P = 0.044); pediatric cytoplasmatic MMP2, 1 (0-3); adult cytoplasmatic MMP2, 0 (0-1) (P = 0.006); pediatric nuclear MMP2, 0 (0-1); adult nuclear MMP2, 0 (0-1) (P = 0.056); pediatric MMP9, 2 (0-4); adult MMP9, 0 (0-4) (P = 0.049). In conclusion, pediatric cholesteatomas present a more exacerbated inflammatory degree, produce more metalloproteinases, factors that, when combined, could characterize pediatric cholesteatomas as more aggressive than adult cholesteatomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19322578     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-0957-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

Review 1.  Role of matrix metalloproteinases in intestinal inflammation.

Authors:  Carlos Medina; Marek W Radomski
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Incidence, etiology and pathogenesis of cholesteatoma in children.

Authors:  M Tos
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1988

3.  Congenital cholesteatoma of external auditory canal.

Authors:  Laura Quantin; Sandra Carrera Fernández; Jorge Moretti
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  [Alterations of the basal membrane in middle ear cholesteatoma].

Authors:  M Bernal Sprekelsen; J Ebmeyer; A Anonopoulos; G Borkowski; H Sudhoff
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2001-05

5.  Epidemiology and aetiology of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  H O Kemppainen; H J Puhakka; P J Laippala; M M Sipilä; M P Manninen; P H Karma
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Angiogenesis and angiogenic growth factors in middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  H Sudhoff; S Dazert; A M Gonzales; G Borkowski; S Y Park; A Baird; H Hildmann; A F Ryan
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-11

7.  Cholesteatoma in children.

Authors:  M E Glasscock; J R Dickins; R Wiet
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  [Role of perimatrix fibroblasts in development of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. A hypothesis].

Authors:  C Milewski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Otomastoid cholesteatoma in children: histopathological findings.

Authors:  A Quaranta; L Resta; A Santangelo
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Tympanic membrane metalloproteinase inflammatory response.

Authors:  Jason G Wilmoth; Gregory S Schultz; Patrick J Antonelli
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics of spontaneous cholesteatoma of the external auditory canal in children comparing with cholesteatoma in adults.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; So-Hye Baek; Sang-Hyo Lee; Go-Woon Kim; Bum-Ki Cho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Aggressiveness of pediatric cholesteatoma. Do we have an evidence?

Authors:  Zareen A Lynrah; Jaimanti Bakshi; Naresh K Panda; N K Khandelwal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-08-22

3.  [Current aspects of paediatric cholesteatomas].

Authors:  J P Thomas; S Volkenstein; A Minovi; S Dazert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  A review of current progress in acquired cholesteatoma management.

Authors:  Chin-Lung Kuo; Wen-Huei Liao; An-Suey Shiao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis: A New Fat Interposition Technique.

Authors:  Issam Saliba; Valérie Sabbah; Jackie Bibeau Poirier
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2018-01-03

6.  Assessment of Subepithelial Angiogenesis in Acquired Cholesteatoma between Pediatric and Adult Patients.

Authors:  Mustafa Aslıer; Taner Kemal Erdağ; Sülen Sarıoğlu; Enis Alpin Güneri; Ahmet Ömer İkiz; Evren Uzun; Erdener Özer
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Microvessel Density (Chalkley Method) in a Series of 79 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Waengertner; Luise Meurer; Marcelle Reesink Cerski
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2011-11-20

8.  Identification of risk factors for residual cholesteatoma in children and adults: a retrospective study on 110 cases of revision surgery.

Authors:  Veronika Volgger; Göran Lindeskog; Eike Krause; Florian Schrötzlmair
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.