Literature DB >> 19322530

Numerical analyses of biomechanical behavior of various orthodontic anchorage implants.

Eva Stahl1, Ludger Keilig, Iman Abdelgader, Andreas Jäger, Christoph Bourauel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The quality and quantity of the alveolar process are considered important influential factors affecting the anchorage effectiveness of orthodontic mini-implants. The objective of this study was to establish the effect of various material parameters in regard to various implant types, sizes, and load directions using the finite element method (FEM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: FE models of the following 16 implants by six different manufacturers were made in idealized jaw bone segments with the program system MSC.Marc/Mentat: Aarhus Mini-Implant (American Orthodontics), AbsoAnchor (Dentos), Dual-Top (Jeil Medical), LOMAS (Mondeal), OrthoImplant (IMTEC), tomas (Dentaurum). The intra-osseous parts of the mini-implants had lengths ranging between 6.7 mm and 10.0 mm, and diameters between 1.2 mm and 2.0 mm. Cortical thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm were simulated. The Young's modulus of cancellous bone was varied between 100 MPa and 1 GPa, the load direction of 0 degrees to 45 degrees in a buccal direction for a load of 5 N. In each case we determined the deflection of the implant head as well as the distribution of stresses and strain in the cortical and cancellous bone.
RESULTS: Deflections of the implants varied between 2 microm (Aarhus Mini-Implant 11.6 mm x 2.0 mm, 2 mm cortex) and 20 microm (AbsoAnchor 12.5 mm x 1.2 mm, 1 mm cortex), the deflection was between 4 microm and 10 microm for most of the implants. The deflections of the implant increased as Young's modulus of the cancellous bone dropped with a cortical thickness of 1 mm. We did not observe such a correlation with a cortical thickness of 2 mm. We measured the highest loads in the bone in all models when the cortical thickness measured 1 mm and with a Young's modulus of cancellous bone of 100 MPa. When the load direction was tilted in a buccal direction, the stresses and amount of strain were reduced by as much as 35%.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the cortical thickness is a decisive parameter for the stability of these mini-implants. When the cortical bone is thinner, the mobility becomes increasingly dependent on the Young's modulus of the cancellous bone. Moreover, the greatest stress and amount of strain occur in the bone when the cortical bone is less thick and Young's modulus of cancellous bone lower.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19322530     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-009-0817-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  21 in total

1.  Skeletodental patterns in patients with multiple congenitally missing teeth.

Authors:  Yocheved Ben-Bassat; Ilana Brin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth.

Authors:  T P Muller; I N Hill; A C Peterson; J R Blayney
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  The facial profile in advanced hypodontia: a mixed longitudinal study of 141 children.

Authors:  K V Sarnäs; B Rune
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Analysis of craniofacial development in children with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.

Authors:  Euphemia LaRee Johnson; Michael W Roberts; Albert D Guckes; L'Tanya J Bailey; Ceib L Phillips; J Timothy Wright
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-11-01

5.  Hypodontia patterns and variations in craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Toshiya Endo; Rieko Ozoe; Sugako Yoshino; Shohachi Shimooka
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Bilateral congenital absence of maxillary lateral incisors: a craniofacial and dental cast analysis.

Authors:  D A Woodworth; P M Sinclair; R G Alexander
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-04

7.  Has hypodontia increased in Caucasians during the 20th century? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nele Mattheeuws; Luc Dermaut; Guy Martens
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Prevalence of tooth agenesis correlated with jaw relationship and dental crowding.

Authors:  L R Dermaut; K R Goeffers; A A De Smit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paediatric dentistry.

Authors:  J H Nunn; N E Carter; T J Gillgrass; R S Hobson; N J Jepson; J G Meechan; F S Nohl
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Craniofacial morphology in patients with multiple congenitally missing permanent teeth.

Authors:  M Nodal; I Kjaer; B Solow
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  16 in total

1.  Morphological and structural characteristics of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Saeed AlSamak; Elias Bitsanis; Margarita Makou; George Eliades
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Istabrak Hasan; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Direct versus indirect loading of orthodontic miniscrew implants-an FEM analysis.

Authors:  C Holberg; P Winterhalder; N Holberg; I Rudzki-Janson; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Measurement of cortical bone thickness in adults by cone-beam computerized tomography for orthodontic miniscrews placement.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Xiao-Ming Gu; Hong-Chen Liu; Zhao-Wu Wang; Chun-Lei Xun
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-17

5.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a newly designed onplant miniplate anchorage system.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Yin-Ying Qu; Li-Jun Jiang; Qian Zhou; Tian-Qi Tang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-05

6.  Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants: part II: implant removal.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Andreas Jäger; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Patient expectations, acceptance and preferences in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants. A randomly controlled study. Part I: insertion techniques.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Investigation of bone conditions for orthodontic anchorage plates in the anterior mandible.

Authors:  Thomas Michael Präger; Hans Georg Brochhagen; Axel Mußler; Robert Mischkowski; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Ralf Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Factors affecting stresses in cortical bone around miniscrew implants: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Ramzi Duaibis; Budi Kusnoto; Raghu Natarajan; Linping Zhao; Carla Evans
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effects of cortical bone thickness at different healing times on microscrew stability.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Lixing Zhao; Zhenrui Xu; Tian Tang; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.