Literature DB >> 19321790

The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces.

Vikram S Chib1, Matthew A Krutky, Kevin M Lynch, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

To manipulate an object, we must simultaneously control the contact forces exerted on the object and the movements of our hand. Two alternative views for manipulation have been proposed: one in which motions and contact forces are represented and controlled by separate neural processes, and one in which motions and forces are controlled jointly, by a single process. To evaluate these alternatives, we designed three tasks in which subjects maintained a specified contact force while their hand was moved by a robotic manipulandum. The prescribed contact force and hand motions were selected in each task to induce the subject to attain one of three goals: (1) exerting a regulated contact force, (2) tracking the motion of the manipulandum, and (3) attaining both force and motion goals concurrently. By comparing subjects' performances in these three tasks, we found that behavior was captured by the summed actions of two independent control systems: one applying the desired force, and the other guiding the hand along the predicted path of the manipulandum. Furthermore, the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation impulses to the posterior parietal cortex selectively disrupted the control of motion but did not affect the regulation of static contact force. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that manipulation of objects is performed by independent brain control of hand motions and interaction forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321790      PMCID: PMC3462071          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5856-08.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  23 in total

1.  Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

Review 3.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Scott H Frey; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Hemispheric differences in motor cortex excitability during a simple index finger abduction task in humans.

Authors:  J G Semmler; M A Nordstrom
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord.

Authors:  S F Giszter; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Penny A MacDonald; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  23 in total

1.  Robustness of muscle synergies underlying three-dimensional force generation at the hand in healthy humans.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Critical damping conditions for third order muscle models: implications for force control.

Authors:  Davide Piovesan; Alberto Pierobon; Ferdinando A Mussa Ivaldi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  The coordinate system for force control.

Authors:  Devjani J Saha; Xiao Hu; Eric Perreault; Wendy Murray; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulation of PPC Affects the Mapping between Motion and Force Signals for Stiffness Perception But Not Motion Control.

Authors:  Raz Leib; Firas Mawase; Amir Karniel; Opher Donchin; John Rothwell; Ilana Nisky; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Force fluctuations while pressing and moving against high- and low-friction touch screen surfaces.

Authors:  Mukta N Joshi; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motor recovery: evidence from kinematic changes induced by robot-assisted therapy in trained and untrained task in the same workspace.

Authors:  L Dipietro; H I Krebs; B T Volpe; J Stein; C Bever; S T Mernoff; S E Fasoli; N Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Should the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis (EPH) be Considered a Scientific Theory?

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 1.422

8.  On force regulation strategies in predictable environments.

Authors:  Maxim Kolesnikov; Davide Piovesan; Kevin M Lynch; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

9.  Force-field compensation in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  Valentina Squeri; Lorenzo Masia; Maura Casadio; Pietro Morasso; Elena Vergaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Separating neural influences from peripheral mechanics: the speed-curvature relation in mechanically constrained actions.

Authors:  James Hermus; Joseph Doeringer; Dagmar Sternad; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.