Jackie Hill1, Martyn Lewis, Howard Bird. 1. Academic & Clinical Unit for Musculoskeletal Nursing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. j.hill@leeds.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether OA patients attending a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) clinic gain 'additional benefit' compared with those attending a traditional junior hospital doctor (JHD) clinic. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with OA attending rheumatology clinics at a UK teaching hospital were randomly allocated to a CNS or JHD clinic and seen at 0, 16, 32 and 48 weeks. The study assessed (i) non-inferiority of the CNS with respect to clinical outcomes (pain, morning stiffness, self-efficacy, physical function and psychological status) and (ii) superiority of the CNS in terms of patient knowledge and satisfaction. RESULTS:Average pain at follow-up was lower in the CNS group: unadjusted mean difference for the JHD group minus the CNS group was 5.3 (95% CI -4.6, 15.2); adjusted was 1.6 (95% CI -5.7, 8.9). The corresponding effect size estimates were 0.20 (95% CI -0.17, 0.57) and 0.06 (95% CI -0.21, 0.33), respectively. There were similar outcomes in morning stiffness, physical function and self-efficacy. Patient knowledge and satisfaction were statistically significant at the 5% level attaining moderate to large effect sizes in favour of the CNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the clinical outcome of CNS care is not inferior to that of JHD care, and patients attending CNS gain additional benefit in that they are better informed about their disease and significantly more satisfied with care than are their counterparts.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether OA patients attending a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) clinic gain 'additional benefit' compared with those attending a traditional junior hospital doctor (JHD) clinic. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with OA attending rheumatology clinics at a UK teaching hospital were randomly allocated to a CNS or JHD clinic and seen at 0, 16, 32 and 48 weeks. The study assessed (i) non-inferiority of the CNS with respect to clinical outcomes (pain, morning stiffness, self-efficacy, physical function and psychological status) and (ii) superiority of the CNS in terms of patient knowledge and satisfaction. RESULTS: Average pain at follow-up was lower in the CNS group: unadjusted mean difference for the JHD group minus the CNS group was 5.3 (95% CI -4.6, 15.2); adjusted was 1.6 (95% CI -5.7, 8.9). The corresponding effect size estimates were 0.20 (95% CI -0.17, 0.57) and 0.06 (95% CI -0.21, 0.33), respectively. There were similar outcomes in morning stiffness, physical function and self-efficacy. Patient knowledge and satisfaction were statistically significant at the 5% level attaining moderate to large effect sizes in favour of the CNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the clinical outcome of CNS care is not inferior to that of JHD care, and patients attending CNS gain additional benefit in that they are better informed about their disease and significantly more satisfied with care than are their counterparts.
Authors: Mwidimi Ndosi; Martyn Lewis; Claire Hale; Helen Quinn; Sarah Ryan; Paul Emery; Howard Bird; Jackie Hill Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Sarah E P Munce; Ian D Graham; Nancy M Salbach; Susan B Jaglal; Carol L Richards; Janice J Eng; Johanne Desrosiers; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; Nancy E Mayo; Robert W Teasell; Merrick Zwarenstein; Jennifer Mokry; Sandra Black; Mark T Bayley Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Juliana Rachel Hoeper; Jan Zeidler; Sara Eileen Meyer; Georg Gauler; Patricia Steffens-Korbanka; Martin Welcker; Jörg Wendler; Florian Schuch; Ulrich von Hinüber; Andreas Schwarting; Torsten Witte; Dirk Meyer-Olson; Kirsten Hoeper Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-04
Authors: Mwidimi Ndosi; Martyn Lewis; Claire Hale; Helen Quinn; Sarah Ryan; Paul Emery; Howard Bird; Jackie Hill Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 19.103