Literature DB >> 19321376

The use of the Ocular Response Analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery.

Sunil Shah1, Mohammad Laiquzzaman, Ian Yeung, Xueliang Pan, Cynthia Roberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare corneal biomechanical parameters and two measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery, with the Ocular Response Analyser (ORA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty normal eyes of 41 patients undergoing excimer laser refractive surgery in Birmingham, U.K. were recruited into three groups: Laser Assisted-Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) (Myopes), Laser Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) (myopes) and LASIK (hyperopes). The preop and 3 months postop Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured by the ORA. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using ultrasonic pachymeter. The differences of the changes in IOPg, IOPcc, CH, CRF and CCT between the three groups were estimated. A General Linear Model was selected to investigate the influence of gender, age, initial conditions (CH, CRF, CCT, IOPcc and IOPg) and changes in CCT on the measured IOP.
RESULTS: The differences between the mean IOPg, CH and CRF after refractive surgery were statistically significant for all three groups. The hyperopic LASIK group had a significantly smaller change compared to the other groups (which had no statistical significance). The preop IOPg, preop CH and gender were significant predictors of the changes in measured pressure and biomechanical parameters after surgery in the myopic groups only.
CONCLUSION: CH and CRF were found to decrease after both myopic and hyperopic refractive surgery. CH and CRF measurement may prove important tools to clarify the role of corneal biomechanics for refractive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321376     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2009.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Abhijit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Short-term effects of overnight orthokeratology on corneal epithelial permeability and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  Thao N Yeh; Harry M Green; Yixiu Zhou; Julie Pitts; Britney Kitamata-Wong; Sophia Lee; Shiyin L Wang; Meng C Lin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Corneal biomechanics in different age groups.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Karim El Massry; Amr Ahmed Said; Ihab Mohamed Osman; Amr Saad Bessa; Mohammed Ahmed Elmasry; Eman Nabil Elsayed; Nader Hussein Lotfy Bayoumi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Differences in the early biomechanical effects of hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Fabricio Witzel de Medeiros; Abhijit Sinha-Roy; Milton Ruiz Alves; Steven E Wilson; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik; Fatmire Berisha; Shakhsanam Aliyeva; Norbert Pfeiffer; Esther M Hoffmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Joshua S Hardin; Christopher I Lee; Lydia F Lane; Christian C Hester; R Grant Morshedi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Ocular response analyzer parameters in healthy, keratoconus suspect and manifest keratoconus eyes.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Ifa Etesami; Zahra Yavari; Mohammad Naderan; Fatemeh Abdollahinia; Mahmoud Jabbarvand
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 May-Aug

8.  Comparison of Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Photorefractive Keratectomy and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Authors:  Yusuf Yıldırım; Onur Ölçücü; Abdurrahman Başcı; Alper Ağca; Engin Bilge Özgürhan; Cengiz Alagöz; Ali Demircan; Ahmet Demirok
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-05

9.  Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Yang Shen; Xiangjian Su; Xiu Liu; Huamao Miao; Xuejun Fang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Sedaghat; Maria Sharepoor; Samira Hassanzadeh; Mojtaba Abrishami
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.