Literature DB >> 19320894

Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model.

David T Corr1, Corrie L Gallant-Behm, Nigel G Shrive, David A Hart.   

Abstract

A new method to test axial and transverse tensile properties of skin was developed to improve our understanding of skin mechanical behavior, and how it changes following injury and formation of a scar. Skin tissue was evaluated at 70 days following full-thickness wounding in juvenile female pigs (N=14). Samples were taken in the axial (cranial-caudal) and transverse (dorsal-ventral) directions, for both scar tissue and uninjured skin, and were evaluated mechanically in vitro using a protocol of stress relaxation followed by tensile failure. Uninjured skin was more compliant, with a larger toe-in region, and faster load relaxation, in the axial direction than the transverse. Such directional differences were not present in high-load responses, such as linear stiffness or failure properties. When compared with uninjured skin, scars displayed a similar linear stiffness, with considerably reduced failure properties, and reduced low-load compliance. Scars showed no directional differences in low-load behavior, viscous response, or failure properties. These findings suggest morphological changes that may occur with injury that are consistent with the viscoelastic and directional changes observed experimentally. This improved understanding of how injury affects skin biomechanical function provides valuable information necessary for the design of successful grafting procedures and tissue-engineered skin replacements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19320894     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00463.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  21 in total

1.  A new experimental model for force enhancement: steady-state and transient observations of the Drosophila jump muscle.

Authors:  Ryan A Koppes; Douglas M Swank; David T Corr
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.249

2.  Effects of substrate stiffness and cell density on primary hippocampal cultures.

Authors:  Michelle L Previtera; Christopher G Langhammer; Bonnie L Firestein
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Feasibility study of corticosteroid treatment for esophageal ulcer after EMR in a canine model.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Tatsuo Nakamura; Yoshio Hori; Yoshiki Shionoya; Kazumichi Yamamoto; Yuji Nishizawa; Fumitsugu Kojima; Keiji Shigeno
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Production-scale fibronectin nanofibers promote wound closure and tissue repair in a dermal mouse model.

Authors:  Christophe O Chantre; Patrick H Campbell; Holly M Golecki; Adrian T Buganza; Andrew K Capulli; Leila F Deravi; Stephanie Dauth; Sean P Sheehy; Jeffrey A Paten; Karl Gledhill; Yanne S Doucet; Hasan E Abaci; Seungkuk Ahn; Benjamin D Pope; Jeffrey W Ruberti; Simon P Hoerstrup; Angela M Christiano; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Multi-modal characterization of polymeric gels to determine the influence of testing method on observed elastic modulus.

Authors:  David M Kingsley; Caitlin H McCleery; Christopher D L Johnson; Michael T K Bramson; Deniz Rende; Ryan J Gilbert; David T Corr
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  A homeostatic-driven turnover remodelling constitutive model for healing in soft tissues.

Authors:  Ester Comellas; T Christian Gasser; Facundo J Bellomo; Sergio Oller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Biomechanics of Scar Tissue and Uninjured Skin.

Authors:  David T Corr; David A Hart
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Fractal heterogeneity in minimal matrix models of scars modulates stiff-niche stem-cell responses via nuclear exit of a mechanorepressor.

Authors:  P C Dave P Dingal; Andrew M Bradshaw; Sangkyun Cho; Matthew Raab; Amnon Buxboim; Joe Swift; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 43.841

9.  Opposite rheological properties of neuronal microcompartments predict axonal vulnerability in brain injury.

Authors:  Thomas Grevesse; Borna E Dabiri; Kevin Kit Parker; Sylvain Gabriele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The connexin 43 carboxyl terminal mimetic peptide αCT1 prompts differentiation of a collagen scar matrix in humans resembling unwounded skin.

Authors:  Jade Montgomery; William J Richardson; Spencer Marsh; J Matthew Rhett; Francis Bustos; Katherine Degen; Gautam S Ghatnekar; Christina L Grek; L Jane Jourdan; Jeffrey W Holmes; Robert G Gourdie
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.