Literature DB >> 19319128

The vexed relationship between Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: an assessment of carriage in an outpatient setting among patients in remission.

Evelyn M Clayton1, Mary C Rea, Fergus Shanahan, Eamonn M M Quigley, Barry Kiely, Colin Hill, R Paul Ross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Comorbidity with Clostridium difficile may cause diagnostic delay in newly presenting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, trigger relapse in established disease, confound therapies, and serve as an indicator of an underlying defect in innate immunity. Retrospective analyses have suggested community acquisition; to address this we conducted a prospective analysis of C. difficile carriage in IBD patients using molecular methods specifically in an outpatient setting.
METHODS: Recruited participants had long-standing diagnoses of ulcerative colitis (n = 64) and Crohn's disease (n = 58), were in clinical remission, and had no recent exposure to antibiotics, corticosteroids, immunomodulatory drugs or recent hospitalization. Isolates were cultured from stools and confirmed by 16S sequencing. The antibiotic susceptibilities of the isolates were tested followed by further strain characterization by toxinotyping, ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
RESULTS: The frequency of toxigenic C. difficile was higher in IBD patients than in healthy volunteers at 8.2 and 1.0%, respectively (P = 0.02 Fisher's exact test). All strains belonged to toxinotype 0 with rare subtypes of this group noted in five isolates and represented by an altered repressor genotype. Patients harbored a diverse range of toxigenic ribotype groups, including those previously associated with C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) (R015, R005, and R020) and the rarer types R062, R050, and R003. Interestingly, common nosocomial groups were not identified. The considerable nonclonal distribution of distinct strains was further demonstrated by PFGE genomic fingerprinting. None of the study subjects experienced a clinical episode of CDAD during a 6-month period of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of C. difficile is increased in IBD outpatients in remission, and strain diversity is consistent with community acquisition from a multitude of sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19319128     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  58 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile prevalence rates in a large healthcare system stratified according to patient population, age, gender, and specimen consistency.

Authors:  J H Boone; M Goodykoontz; S J Rhodes; K Price; J Smith; K N Gearhart; R J Carman; T M Kerkering; T D Wilkins; D M Lyerly
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Clostridium difficile carriage in elderly subjects and associated changes in the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Mary C Rea; Orla O'Sullivan; Fergus Shanahan; Paul W O'Toole; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection using fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Krista M Newman; Kevin M Rank; Byron P Vaughn; Alexander Khoruts
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2017-01-19

4.  Preoperative Clostridium difficile infection is not associated with an increased risk for the infection in ileal pouch patients.

Authors:  Chao Sun; Peng Du; Xian-rui Wu; Elaine Queener; Bo Shen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Defining quality indicators for best-practice management of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Nguyen; Shane M Devlin; Waqqas Afif; Brian Bressler; Steven E Gruchy; Gilaad G Kaplan; Liliana Oliveira; Sophie Plamondon; Cynthia H Seow; Chadwick Williams; Karen Wong; Brian M Yan; Jennifer Jones
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05

Review 6.  The intestinal microbiome, barrier function, and immune system in inflammatory bowel disease: a tripartite pathophysiological circuit with implications for new therapeutic directions.

Authors:  Stephen M Vindigni; Timothy L Zisman; David L Suskind; Christopher J Damman
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: role in pathogenesis and implications in treatment.

Authors:  Orna Nitzan; Mazen Elias; Bibiana Chazan; Raul Raz; Walid Saliba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Host Immune Response to Clostridium difficile Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

Authors:  Michelle Hughes; Taha Qazi; Adam Berg; Janice Weinberg; Xinhua Chen; Ciaran P Kelly; Francis A Farraye
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.325

9.  Similar outcomes of IBD inpatients with Clostridium difficile infection detected by ELISA or PCR assay.

Authors:  Yinghong Wang; Ashish Atreja; Xianrui Wu; Bret A Lashner; Aaron Brzezinski; Bo Shen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Nancy Fu; Titus Wong
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.