Literature DB >> 19319040

Dermal suspension and parenchymal reshaping mastopexy after massive weight loss: statistical analysis with concomitant procedures from a prospective registry.

J Peter Rubin1, Jeffrey A Gusenoff, Devin Coon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of women are presenting for mastopexy after massive weight loss. The authors analyzed data from a prospective registry of massive weight loss patients who underwent the dermal suspension and parenchymal reshaping mastopexy alone or with concomitant operations to assess safety and efficacy.
METHODS: One hundred eight female massive weight loss patients underwent mastopexy. Variables included operative time; time since gastric bypass; body mass index; revision; and complications such as seroma, dehiscence, hematoma, and infection. Univariate analyses were performed to assess outcome measures.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients underwent mastopexy without implant [mean age, 43.7 +/- 9 years; mean intraoperative time, 8.5 +/- 3 hours (mastopexy plus concomitant procedures), mean body mass index, 28.3 +/- 3.9; mean time since gastric bypass, 27.5 +/- 13.4 months; mean follow-up, 7.3 months], whereas 17 had augmentation/mastopexy. Eighty-five of 91 patients (93.4 percent) had multiple procedures performed. Wound dehiscence was the most common complication in 26 patients (29.2 percent); however, breast-specific complications overall occurred in only eight patients (8.8 percent). Body mass index and operative time did not predict an increase in complication rates. Patients who underwent augmentation/mastopexy had a lower current body mass index than those who had mastopexy alone (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Dermal suspension, parenchymal reshaping mastopexy is a safe, effective, and durable method of treating the deflated breast after massive weight loss. Although patients with massive weight loss are likely to present for longer procedures and have a higher rate of wound-healing complications, these complications occur most frequently in areas other than the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19319040     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819ba1a8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Utilizing the lateral excess for autologous augmentation in massive weight loss patients.

Authors:  Martin Söderman; Peder Ikander; Slaven Boljanovic; Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

2.  An original and simple autoaugmentation mastopexy in mild to moderate breast ptosis: superior pedicle frontal division to achieve upper pole fullness.

Authors:  Loubna Abboud; William Watfa; Pietro G di Summa; Wassim Raffoul
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

3.  Auto-Augmentation Mastopexy: Inferiorly Based Parenchymal Flap Technique and Evaluation of Outcomes Using BREAST-Q After 151 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Maximilian Zaussinger; Raphael Wenny; Georg M Huemer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Shape Correction of the Ptotic Breast: Limits and Benefits of Auto-Augmentation Mastopexy.

Authors:  Maximilian Zaussinger; Georg M Huemer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Split Inferior Pedicle: The 1-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy for Grade 3 Ptosis.

Authors:  Alexia Stamatiou; Christina Stamatiou; Vassilis Stamatiou
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  Dermal Triangular Flaps to Prevent Pseudoptosis in Mastopexy Surgery: The Hammock Technique.

Authors:  William Watfa; Patrice Zaugg; Julien Baudoin; Russell J Bramhall; Wassim Raffoul; Pietro G di Summa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.