Literature DB >> 19318595

Key principles to guide development of consumer medicine information--content analysis of information design texts.

David K Raynor1, David Dickinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective written consumer medicines information is essential to support safe and effective medicine taking, but the wording and layout of currently provided materials do not meet patients' needs.
OBJECTIVE: To identify principles from the wider discipline of information design for use by health professionals when developing or assessing written drug information for patients.
METHODS: Six experts in information design nominated texts on best practice in information design applicable to consumer medicines information. A content analysis identified key principles that were tabulated to bring out key themes.
RESULTS: Six texts that met the inclusion criteria, were identified, and content analysis indentified 4 themes: words, type, lines, and layout. Within these main themes, there were 24 subthemes. Selected principles relating to these subthemes were: use short familiar words, short sentences, and short headings that stand out from the text; use a conversational tone of voice, addressing the reader as "you"; use a large type size while retaining sufficient white space; use bullet points to organize lists; use unjustified text (ragged right) and bold, lower-case text for emphasis. Pictures or graphics do not necessarily improve a document.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying the good information design principles identified to written consumer medicines information could support health professionals when developing and assessing drug information for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19318595     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1L522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  18 in total

1.  Placement and Format of Risk Information on Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Websites.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Douglas J Rupert; Jessica Fitts Willoughby; Kathryn J Aikin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-01-27

Review 2.  Strategies to optimize comprehension of numerical medication instructions: A systematic review and concept map.

Authors:  Marianne Sharko; Mohit M Sharma; Natalie C Benda; Melissa Chan; Eric Wilsterman; Lisa Grossman Liu; Michelle Demetres; Diana Delgado; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  Evaluation of Multimedia Medication Reconciliation Software: A Randomized Controlled, Single-Blind Trial to Measure Diagnostic Accuracy for Discrepancy Detection.

Authors:  Blake J Lesselroth; Kathleen Adams; Victoria L Church; Stephanie Tallett; Yelizaveta Russ; Jack Wiedrick; Christopher Forsberg; David A Dorr
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose?--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter Knapp; David K Raynor; Jonathan Silcock; Brian Parkinson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for long-term conditions in primary care: two embedded, randomised controlled trials of optimised patient information materials.

Authors:  Mei-See Man; Jo Rick; Peter Bower
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jo Rick; Jonathan Graffy; Peter Knapp; Nicola Small; David J Collier; Sandra Eldridge; Anne Kennedy; Chris Salisbury; Shaun Treweek; David Torgerson; Paul Wallace; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Adwoa Hughes-Morley; Peter Bower
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Adaptation of the European Commission-recommended user testing method to patient medication information leaflets in Japan.

Authors:  Michiko Yamamoto; Hirohisa Doi; Ken Yamamoto; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Tsugumichi Sato; Machi Suka; Takeo Nakayama; Hiroki Sugimori
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2017-06-14

8.  Performance-based readability testing of participant information for a Phase 3 IVF trial.

Authors:  Peter Knapp; D K Raynor; Jonathan Silcock; Brian Parkinson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) summaries for the public: are they fit for purpose? A user-testing study.

Authors:  David K Raynor; David Bryant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Youth, caregiver, and prescriber experiences of antipsychotic-related weight gain.

Authors:  Andrea Lynn Murphy; David Martin Gardner; Steve Kisely; Charmaine Cooke; Stanley Paul Kutcher; Jean Hughes
Journal:  ISRN Obes       Date:  2013-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.