PURPOSE: Although few women with advanced serous ovarian cancer are cured, detection of the disease at an early stage is associated with a much higher likelihood of survival. We previously used gene expression array analysis to distinguish subsets of advanced cancers based on disease outcome. In the present study, we report on gene expression of early-stage cancers and validate our prognostic model for advanced-stage cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Frozen specimens from 39 stage I/II, 42 stage III/IV, and 20 low malignant potential cancers were obtained from four different sites. A linear discriminant model was used to predict survival based upon array data. RESULTS: We validated the late-stage survival model and show that three of the most differentially expressed genes continue to be predictive of outcome. Most early-stage cancers (38 of 39 invasive, 15 of 20 low malignant potential) were classified as long-term survivors (median probabilities 0.97 and 0.86). MAL, the most differentially expressed gene, was further validated at the protein level and found to be an independent predictor of poor survival in an unselected group of advanced serous cancers (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that serous ovarian cancers detected at an early stage generally have a favorable underlying biology similar to advanced-stage cases that are long-term survivors. Conversely, most late-stage ovarian cancers seem to have a more virulent biology. This insight suggests that if screening approaches are to succeed it will be necessary to develop approaches that are able to detect these virulent cancers at an early stage.
PURPOSE: Although few women with advanced serous ovarian cancer are cured, detection of the disease at an early stage is associated with a much higher likelihood of survival. We previously used gene expression array analysis to distinguish subsets of advanced cancers based on disease outcome. In the present study, we report on gene expression of early-stage cancers and validate our prognostic model for advanced-stage cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Frozen specimens from 39 stage I/II, 42 stage III/IV, and 20 low malignant potential cancers were obtained from four different sites. A linear discriminant model was used to predict survival based upon array data. RESULTS: We validated the late-stage survival model and show that three of the most differentially expressed genes continue to be predictive of outcome. Most early-stage cancers (38 of 39 invasive, 15 of 20 low malignant potential) were classified as long-term survivors (median probabilities 0.97 and 0.86). MAL, the most differentially expressed gene, was further validated at the protein level and found to be an independent predictor of poor survival in an unselected group of advanced serous cancers (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that serous ovarian cancers detected at an early stage generally have a favorable underlying biology similar to advanced-stage cases that are long-term survivors. Conversely, most late-stage ovarian cancers seem to have a more virulent biology. This insight suggests that if screening approaches are to succeed it will be necessary to develop approaches that are able to detect these virulent cancers at an early stage.
Authors: Monica Benito; Joel Parker; Quan Du; Junyuan Wu; Dong Xiang; Charles M Perou; J S Marron Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Giovanni Parmigiani; Elizabeth S Garrett-Mayer; Ramaswamy Anbazhagan; Edward Gabrielson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: V Shridhar; J Lee; A Pandita; S Iturria; R Avula; J Staub; M Morrissey; E Calhoun; A Sen; K Kalli; G Keeney; P Roche; W Cliby; K Lu; R Schmandt; G B Mills; R C Bast; C D James; F J Couch; L C Hartmann; J Lillie; D I Smith Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Robert F Ozols; Brian N Bundy; Benjamin E Greer; Jeffrey M Fowler; Daniel Clarke-Pearson; Robert A Burger; Robert S Mannel; Koen DeGeest; Ellen M Hartenbach; Rebecca Baergen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W J Hoskins; W P McGuire; M F Brady; H D Homesley; W T Creasman; M Berman; H Ball; J S Berek Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Richard W Tothill; Anna V Tinker; Joshy George; Robert Brown; Stephen B Fox; Stephen Lade; Daryl S Johnson; Melanie K Trivett; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Bianca Locandro; Nadia Traficante; Sian Fereday; Jillian A Hung; Yoke-Eng Chiew; Izhak Haviv; Dorota Gertig; Anna DeFazio; David D L Bowtell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mario M Leitao; Robert A Soslow; Rebecca N Baergen; Narciso Olvera; Crispinita Arroyo; Jeff Boyd Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Donald R Schwartz; Sharon L R Kardia; Kerby A Shedden; Rork Kuick; George Michailidis; Jeremy M G Taylor; David E Misek; Rong Wu; Yali Zhai; Danielle M Darrah; Heather Reed; Lora H Ellenson; Thomas J Giordano; Eric R Fearon; Samir M Hanash; Kathleen R Cho Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Gregory P Sfakianos; Edwin S Iversen; Regina Whitaker; Liudmila Akushevich; Joellen M Schildkraut; Susan K Murphy; Jeffrey R Marks; Andrew Berchuck Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-12-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Eric B Meltzer; William T Barry; Thomas A D'Amico; Robert D Davis; Shu S Lin; Mark W Onaitis; Lake D Morrison; Thomas A Sporn; Mark P Steele; Paul W Noble Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Marcus Q Bernardini; Tsukasa Baba; Paula S Lee; Jason C Barnett; Gregory P Sfakianos; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Susan K Murphy; Edwin Iversen; Jeffrey R Marks; Andrew Berchuck Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Kouros Owzar; Chen Jiang; Taylor Turner; Yiwen Deng; Sarah M Bean; Janet K Horton; Andrew Berchuck; Jeffrey R Marks; Mark W Dewhirst; Angeles Alvarez Secord Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 5.482