PURPOSE: The study aim to identify novel molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer by gene expression profiling with linkage to clinical and pathologic features. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Microarray gene expression profiling was done on 285 serous and endometrioid tumors of the ovary, peritoneum, and fallopian tube. K-means clustering was applied to identify robust molecular subtypes. Statistical analysis identified differentially expressed genes, pathways, and gene ontologies. Laser capture microdissection, pathology review, and immunohistochemistry validated the array-based findings. Patient survival within k-means groups was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Class prediction validated k-means groups in an independent dataset. A semisupervised survival analysis of the array data was used to compare against unsupervised clustering results. RESULTS: Optimal clustering of array data identified six molecular subtypes. Two subtypes represented predominantly serous low malignant potential and low-grade endometrioid subtypes, respectively. The remaining four subtypes represented higher grade and advanced stage cancers of serous and endometrioid morphology. A novel subtype of high-grade serous cancers reflected a mesenchymal cell type, characterized by overexpression of N-cadherin and P-cadherin and low expression of differentiation markers, including CA125 and MUC1. A poor prognosis subtype was defined by a reactive stroma gene expression signature, correlating with extensive desmoplasia in such samples. A similar poor prognosis signature could be found using a semisupervised analysis. Each subtype displayed distinct levels and patterns of immune cell infiltration. Class prediction identified similar subtypes in an independent ovarian dataset with similar prognostic trends. CONCLUSION: Gene expression profiling identified molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer of biological and clinical importance.
PURPOSE: The study aim to identify novel molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer by gene expression profiling with linkage to clinical and pathologic features. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Microarray gene expression profiling was done on 285 serous and endometrioid tumors of the ovary, peritoneum, and fallopian tube. K-means clustering was applied to identify robust molecular subtypes. Statistical analysis identified differentially expressed genes, pathways, and gene ontologies. Laser capture microdissection, pathology review, and immunohistochemistry validated the array-based findings. Patient survival within k-means groups was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Class prediction validated k-means groups in an independent dataset. A semisupervised survival analysis of the array data was used to compare against unsupervised clustering results. RESULTS: Optimal clustering of array data identified six molecular subtypes. Two subtypes represented predominantly serous low malignant potential and low-grade endometrioid subtypes, respectively. The remaining four subtypes represented higher grade and advanced stage cancers of serous and endometrioid morphology. A novel subtype of high-grade serous cancers reflected a mesenchymal cell type, characterized by overexpression of N-cadherin and P-cadherin and low expression of differentiation markers, including CA125 and MUC1. A poor prognosis subtype was defined by a reactive stroma gene expression signature, correlating with extensive desmoplasia in such samples. A similar poor prognosis signature could be found using a semisupervised analysis. Each subtype displayed distinct levels and patterns of immune cell infiltration. Class prediction identified similar subtypes in an independent ovarian dataset with similar prognostic trends. CONCLUSION: Gene expression profiling identified molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer of biological and clinical importance.
Authors: Sebastian Vaughan; Jermaine I Coward; Robert C Bast; Andy Berchuck; Jonathan S Berek; James D Brenton; George Coukos; Christopher C Crum; Ronny Drapkin; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Michael Friedlander; Hani Gabra; Stan B Kaye; Chris J Lord; Ernst Lengyel; Douglas A Levine; Iain A McNeish; Usha Menon; Gordon B Mills; Kenneth P Nephew; Amit M Oza; Anil K Sood; Euan A Stronach; Henning Walczak; David D Bowtell; Frances R Balkwill Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Tongtong Kan; Wei Wang; Philip P Ip; Shengtao Zhou; Alice S Wong; Xin Wang; Mengsu Yang Journal: Oncogene Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Pradeep Chaluvally-Raghavan; Fan Zhang; Sunila Pradeep; Mark P Hamilton; Xi Zhao; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Tyler Moss; Yiling Lu; Shuangxing Yu; Chad V Pecot; Miriam R Aure; Sylvain Peuget; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Hee-Dong Han; Dong Zhang; Avinashnarayan Venkatanarayan; Marit Krohn; Vessela N Kristensen; Mihai Gagea; Prahlad Ram; Wenbin Liu; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Philip L Lorenzi; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Koei Chin; Joe Gray; Nelson J Dusetti; Sean E McGuire; Elsa R Flores; Anil K Sood; Gordon B Mills Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Yi Kan Wang; Ali Bashashati; Michael S Anglesio; Dawn R Cochrane; Diljot S Grewal; Gavin Ha; Andrew McPherson; Hugo M Horlings; Janine Senz; Leah M Prentice; Anthony N Karnezis; Daniel Lai; Mohamed R Aniba; Allen W Zhang; Karey Shumansky; Celia Siu; Adrian Wan; Melissa K McConechy; Hector Li-Chang; Alicia Tone; Diane Provencher; Manon de Ladurantaye; Hubert Fleury; Aikou Okamoto; Satoshi Yanagida; Nozomu Yanaihara; Misato Saito; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Marco A Marra; C Blake Gilks; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; David G Huntsman; Sohrab P Shah Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 38.330