Literature DB >> 19318150

How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal examination with spatial position-tracking ruler.

Jacky Nizard1, Shoshana Haberman, Yoav Paltieli, Ron Gonen, Gonen Ohel, Diane Nicholson, Yves Ville.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical measurement of cervical dilation with a position-tracking system during vaginal examination. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective study that was conducted in Poissy, France, Brooklyn, NY, and Haifa, Israel, included 333 measurements that were performed in 188 women with term singleton vertex uncomplicated pregnancies during the active stage of labor. Ninety measurements with clinical diagnosis of full dilation were excluded from analysis. Measurements were performed with a sensor attached to the midwife's index fingertip and a position-tracking system that was based on a low magnetic field. Evaluations were done when cervical examinations were clinically indicated.
RESULTS: Results were similar in all centers. Mean error was 10.2 +/- 8.4 mm and ranged from 7.5 +/- 7.3 mm, when cervical dilation was > 8 cm, to 12.5 +/- 8.7 mm when cervical dilation was between 6.1 and 8 cm.
CONCLUSION: This first evaluation of cervical assessment accuracy during vaginal examination with a position-tracking system shows limited precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19318150     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Ultrasound-based fetal tracking technology during labor: is it the next best thing?

Authors:  Kimmelin Hull
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

Review 3.  New techniques in evaluation of the cervix.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich; Lindsey Carlson
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor.

Authors:  Sigurlaug Benediktsdottir; Torbjørn M Eggebø; Kjell Å Salvesen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.