Literature DB >> 19317935

Buccal mucosal grafts for urethroplasty: comparison of postoperative oral and perineal morbidity.

Khalid Abdel-Galil1, Ian Eardley, Richard Loukota.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A prospective study of postoperative oral and perineal pain experienced by a group of patients undergoing buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethral reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive group of 24 male patients undergoing buccal mucosa graft harvest for urethral reconstruction of stricture disease was prospectively studied between June 2006 and December 2008. All patients were examined pre-operatively and entered into the study prospectively. After surgery, all patients were reviewed at 24 h and 48 h. On both occasions, they were asked to complete a proforma containing visual analogue pain scales for both the oral donor site as well as the perineum.
RESULTS: A statistically significant higher level of pain was experienced from the perineum than the oral donor site on both the first and second postoperative days.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparative analysis of visual analogue pain scale scores between oral donor site and perineum showed that patients experience significantly more pain from the latter postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317935      PMCID: PMC2749346          DOI: 10.1308/003588409X391875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Ventral onlay graft techniques for urethroplasty.

Authors:  Hunter Wessells
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  R A Bürger; S C Müller; H el-Damanhoury; A Tschakaloff; H Riedmiller; R Hohenfellner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The free buccal mucosal graft for urethroplasty.

Authors:  L Tolstunov; A Pogrel
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1996-12

5.  Buccal mucosal grafts for urethroplasty: surgical technique and morbidity.

Authors:  G Fabbroni; R A Loukota; I Eardley
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  A W el-Kasaby; M Fath-Alla; A M Noweir; M R el-Halaby; W Zakaria; M H el-Beialy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty.

Authors:  L Tolstunov; M A Pogrel; J W McAninch
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-11

8.  A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction.

Authors:  B L Eppley; M Keating; R Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Single-stage dorsal inlay for reconstruction of recurrent peno-glandular stenosis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Margit Mayer; Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Roosen; Philipp Nuhn; Ricarda M Bauer; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.