Literature DB >> 19317789

Guide to the assessment of competence and performance in practising surgeons.

Ian Dickinson1, David Watters, Ian Graham, Pam Montgomery, John Collins.   

Abstract

Surgical performance is increasingly under public scrutiny and non-technical behavioural issues are more frequently the focus of complaints. Currently, there is a lack of a suitable framework or template to assist surgeons in the assessment of their own performance or that of their colleagues. A Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Working Party considered the methods currently available to define and assess surgical performance. The scope included assessment tools, resources available, and support for surgeons. The Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) programme developed by the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh and the School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen was of particular interest. This programme was reviewed, adapted and expanded. The nine RACS competencies were used as the foundation for developing a set of three behavioural patterns within each competency domain. Each behavioural pattern was then described by a set of eight behavioural markers--describing four good and four poor behaviours. A variety of resources were identified to assist surgeons, including College and other similar courses and guidelines, publications covering professionalism and health issues and support through various agencies. It was recognized that the College has a role to support its Fellows and to ensure any review of performance is conducted impartially, competently and confidentially. The resulting guide was approved by College Council in June 2008 and later distributed to Fellows and hospitals throughout Australia and New Zealand. It is intended to be used for self-reflection and self-assessment, although it could equally be used as a template for the review of an individual surgeon's performance by a clinical director of surgery or other agency. Considerable progress has been made in the assessment of performance of practising surgeons. This guide has been published to address performance issues across all RACS competencies. It also outlines a variety of assessment methods and strategies to support surgeons.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317789     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04839.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  7 in total

1.  [Quality and objectifiability of training and advanced training in urology].

Authors:  S C Müller; T Strunk; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Assessment and maintenance of competence in urology.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Muhammed Jawad; Prokar Dasgupta; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou; Mohammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Safe eye surgery: non-technical aspects.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; A Reddy; G Wilkinson; R Flin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Introduction of the non-technical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) system in a Japanese cancer center.

Authors:  Akira Tsuburaya; Takahiro Soma; Takaki Yoshikawa; Haruhiko Cho; Tamotsu Miki; Masashi Uramatsu; Yoshikazu Fujisawa; George Youngson; Steven Yule
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Defining decision making: a qualitative study of international experts' views on surgical trainee decision making.

Authors:  Sarah C Rennie; Andre M van Rij; Chrystal Jaye; Katherine H Hall
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Patient safety in surgery: non-technical aspects of safe surgical performance.

Authors:  George G Youngson; Rhona Flin
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

7.  Surgical checklist for cataract surgery: progress with the initiative by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists to improve patient safety.

Authors:  S P Kelly; L R Steeples; R Smith; A Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.