Literature DB >> 20567253

Assessment and maintenance of competence in urology.

Kamran Ahmed1, Muhammed Jawad, Prokar Dasgupta, Ara Darzi, Thanos Athanasiou, Mohammad Shamim Khan.   

Abstract

Urology is becoming increasingly reliant on inter-disciplinary collaboration. As a result of this interaction and developments in technology, the existing system of training, certification and recertification needs revision. The skill-set required of urologists has become multidimensional. As the field of urology continues to evolve, the recognition of the need for objective and efficient certification for trainees and a recertification program for specialists has increased. Training programs need to provide a curriculum focused on knowledge, communication, cognitive and technical skills, with the inclusion of simulation-based training. For specialists, the benefits of teaching through mentorship should be evaluated, and outcome-based assessment of patient morbidity and mortality needs to be further developed and validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567253     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  80 in total

1.  Validation of a flexible cystoscopy course.

Authors:  J Shah; B Montgomery; S Langley; A Darzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics.

Authors:  Richard M Satava; Anthony G Gallagher; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides.

Authors:  Suzanne Kurtz; Jonathan Silverman; John Benson; Juliet Draper
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill.

Authors:  Ethan D Grober; Stanley J Hamstra; Kyle R Wanzel; Richard K Reznick; Edward D Matsumoto; Ravindar S Sidhu; Keith A Jarvi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Patient safety and teamwork in perinatal care: resources for clinicians.

Authors:  Lisa A Miller
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

6.  High-level virtual reality simulator for endourologic procedures of lower urinary tract.

Authors:  Oliver Reich; Margarita Noll; Christian Gratzke; Alexander Bachmann; Raphaela Waidelich; Michael Seitz; Boris Schlenker; Reinhold Baumgartner; Alfons Hofstetter; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Mechanical simulators for training for laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Jan Klein; Dogu Teber; Michael Schulze; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  David A K Watters; Anthony J Green; Andre van Rij
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.

Authors:  C P Van Der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853

10.  Role of virtual reality simulation in teaching and assessing technical skills in endovascular intervention.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Aoife N Keeling; Morkos Fakhry; Hutan Ashrafian; Rajesh Aggarwal; Peter A Naughton; Ara Darzi; Nicholas Cheshire; Thanos Athanasiou; Mohammed Hamady
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Training the resident in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  M Hammad Ather; Chi-Fai Ng; Gholamraza Pourmand; Palle J Osther
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-16

Review 2.  Bringing excellence into urology: How to improve the future training of residents?

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Sabina Sevcenco; Franklin Emmanuel Kuehhas; Christian Bach; Noor Buchholz; Fabian Adams; Konrad Wilhelm; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-23

3.  Towards development and validation of an intraoperative assessment tool for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy training: results of a Delphi study.

Authors:  Christopher Morris; Jen Hoogenes; Bobby Shayegan; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS).

Authors:  P Rusch; T Ind; R Kimmig; A Maggioni; J Ponce; V Zanagnolo; P J Coronado; J Verguts; E Lambaudie; H Falconer; J W Collins; Rhm Verheijen
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

Review 5.  Decision making in urological surgery.

Authors:  Hamid Abboudi; Kamran Ahmed; Pasha Normahani; May Abboudi; Roger Kirby; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery-the ICARS system.

Authors:  Nicholas Raison; Thomas Wood; Oliver Brunckhorst; Takashige Abe; Talisa Ross; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed Shamim Khan; Giacomo Novara; Nicolo Buffi; Henk Van Der Poel; Craig McIlhenny; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program.

Authors:  Anna H de Vries; Scheltus J van Luijk; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Ad J M Hendrikx; Evert L Koldewijn; Cordula Wagner; Barbara M A Schout
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.