Literature DB >> 19308632

Correlation between Ka/Ks and Ks is related to substitution model and evolutionary lineage.

Jun Li1, Zhang Zhang, Søren Vang, Jun Yu, Gane Ka-Shu Wong, Jun Wang.   

Abstract

In 2005, Wyckoff and coworkers described a surprisingly strong correlation between Ka/Ks and Ks in several data sets using the LPB93 algorithm. This finding indicated the possibility of a paradigm shift in the way selection strength can be measured using the Ka/Ks ratio. We carried out a calculation of Ka and Ks using six different algorithms on three cross-species orthologous data sets and found a highly variable correlation among the algorithms and lineages. Algorithms based on the GY-HKY substitution model exhibit a weaker positive correlation or a stronger negative correlation than those based on the K2P and JC69 substitution model. Even if one algorithm shows a positive correlation between Ka/Ks and Ks in a warm-blooded lineage, it may show no correlation in a cold-blooded lineage. This algorithm-related and evolutionary lineage-related correlation indicates the need for great caution in drawing conclusions when using only one Ka and Ks algorithm in a genomewide analysis of selection strength. Our results indicated that currently used algorithms for Ka and Ks calculations are flawed and need improvements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19308632     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-009-9222-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  28 in total

1.  Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution.

Authors:  W H Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates.

Authors:  S V Muse
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.

Authors:  N Goldman; Z Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes.

Authors:  W H Li; C I Wu; C C Luo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes.

Authors:  Ben-Yang Liao; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes.

Authors:  J Zhang; H F Rosenberg; M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tomislav Domazet-Loso; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Evaluation of six methods for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Jun Yu
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.691

9.  Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Uncovering the mutation-fixation correlation in short lineages.

Authors:  Eric J Vallender; Bruce T Lahn
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Statistics and truth in phylogenomics.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Alan J Filipski; Fabia U Battistuzzi; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Large scale of human duplicate genes divergence.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  The Roles of Mutation, Selection, and Expression in Determining Relative Rates of Evolution in Mitochondrial versus Nuclear Genomes.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Decoding the effects of synonymous variants.

Authors:  Zishuo Zeng; Ariel A Aptekmann; Yana Bromberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes provides insights into the mechanisms underlying an S-type cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Rui Wang; Qingsong Ba; Lanlan Zhang; Weilun Wang; Pengfei Zhang; Guiping Li
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Complete genome sequence of the Pogostemon cablin bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum strain SY1.

Authors:  Yunhao Sun; Yutong Su; Ansar Hussain; Lina Xiong; Chunji Li; Jie Zhang; Zhen Meng; Zhangyong Dong; Guohui Yu
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Overexpression of CD61 promotes hUC-MSC differentiation into male germ-like cells.

Authors:  Bo Li; Weishuai Liu; Mengru Zhuang; Na Li; Siyu Wu; Shaohui Pan; Jinlian Hua
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Evolutionary history of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) family of 43 plants and characterization of Hsp90s in Solanum tuberosum.

Authors:  Wan Li; Yue Chen; Minghui Ye; Dongdong Wang; Qin Chen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Rates of evolution in stress-related genes are associated with habitat preference in two Cardamine lineages.

Authors:  Lino Ometto; Mingai Li; Luisa Bresadola; Claudio Varotto
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Transcriptome sequencing and analysis of wild Amur Ide (Leuciscus waleckii) inhabiting an extreme alkaline-saline lake reveals insights into stress adaptation.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Peifeng Ji; Baosen Wang; Lan Zhao; Jian Wang; Zixia Zhao; Yan Zhang; Jiongtang Li; Peng Xu; Xiaowen Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.