OBJECTIVE: To characterize trends in prescribing carbamazepine (CBZ), sodium valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) in adolescent females in the UK and to examine possible reasons for changing trends. DESIGN: Population-based observational study. SETTING: UK General Practice Research Database between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2006. PATIENTS: 12-18-year-old subjects who were issued >or=1 CBZ, VPA or LTG prescription. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescribing prevalences stratified by age, gender and antiepileptic drug. RESULTS: 5417 patients (47.6% females) were prescribed 147 111 prescriptions for CBZ (34.5%), VPA (38.6%) or LTG (26.9%). The prevalence of LTG prescribing in females increased from 0.08 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.12) to 0.80 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.89) per 1000 female population. Conversely, the prevalence in females of CBZ and VPA prescribing significantly decreased from 1.00 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.15) to 0.51 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.58) and from 0.94 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.09) to 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.72), respectively. This 10-fold rise in LTG prescribing in females is much higher than the fivefold rise in males from 0.09 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.14) to 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.54) per 1000 male population. CONCLUSION: The practice of prescribing antiepileptic drugs in adolescents has changed gradually over the last decade. More females aged 12-18 years are prescribed LTG than CBZ or VPA and the increase is much greater than for males. The increase in LTG prescribing mirrors a corresponding decrease in both VPA and CBZ. Concerns about potential problems to offspring appear to be affecting prescription trends in adolescent females of child-bearing potential.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize trends in prescribing carbamazepine (CBZ), sodium valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) in adolescent females in the UK and to examine possible reasons for changing trends. DESIGN: Population-based observational study. SETTING: UK General Practice Research Database between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2006. PATIENTS: 12-18-year-old subjects who were issued >or=1 CBZ, VPA or LTG prescription. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescribing prevalences stratified by age, gender and antiepileptic drug. RESULTS: 5417 patients (47.6% females) were prescribed 147 111 prescriptions for CBZ (34.5%), VPA (38.6%) or LTG (26.9%). The prevalence of LTG prescribing in females increased from 0.08 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.12) to 0.80 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.89) per 1000 female population. Conversely, the prevalence in females of CBZ and VPA prescribing significantly decreased from 1.00 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.15) to 0.51 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.58) and from 0.94 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.09) to 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.72), respectively. This 10-fold rise in LTG prescribing in females is much higher than the fivefold rise in males from 0.09 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.14) to 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.54) per 1000 male population. CONCLUSION: The practice of prescribing antiepileptic drugs in adolescents has changed gradually over the last decade. More females aged 12-18 years are prescribed LTG than CBZ or VPA and the increase is much greater than for males. The increase in LTG prescribing mirrors a corresponding decrease in both VPA and CBZ. Concerns about potential problems to offspring appear to be affecting prescription trends in adolescent females of child-bearing potential.
Authors: Shahram Shahangian; Todd D Alspach; J Rex Astles; Ajay Yesupriya; William K Dettwyler Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Gus A Baker; Rebecca L Bromley; Maria Briggs; Christopher P Cheyne; Morris J Cohen; Marta García-Fiñana; Alison Gummery; Rachel Kneen; David W Loring; George Mawer; Kimford J Meador; Rebekah Shallcross; Jill Clayton-Smith Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: William V Bobo; Robert L Davis; Sengwee Toh; De-Kun Li; Susan E Andrade; T Craig Cheetham; Pamala Pawloski; Sascha Dublin; Simone Pinheiro; Tarek Hammad; Pamela E Scott; Richard A Epstein; Patrick G Arbogast; James A Morrow; Judith A Dudley; Jean M Lawrence; Lyndsay A Avalos; William O Cooper Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.980