Literature DB >> 19307048

Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.

Andreas Fottner1, Markus Schmid, Christof Birkenmaier, Farhad Mazoochian, Wolfgang Plitz, Jansson Volkmar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stemless and short-stemmed hip prostheses have been developed to preserve femoral bone stock. While all these prostheses claim a more or less physiological load transfer, clinical long-term results are only available for the stemless thrust plate prosthesis. In this study, the in vitro primary stability of the thrust plate prosthesis was compared to two types of short-stemmed prostheses. In addition to the well-established Mayo prosthesis, the modular Metha prosthesis was tested using cone adapters with 130 degrees and 140 degrees neck-shaft-angles.
METHODS: The prostheses were implanted in composite femurs and loaded dynamically (300-1700 N). Three-dimensional micromotions at the bone-prosthesis interface were measured. In addition, the three-dimensional deformations at the surface of the composite femur were measured to gain data on the strain distribution.
FINDINGS: For all tested prostheses, the micromotions did not exceed 150 microm, the critical value for osteointegration. The thrust plate prosthesis revealed similar motions as the short-stemmed prostheses. The short-stemmed prosthesis with the 130 degrees cone tended to have the highest micromotions of all tested short-stemmed prostheses. The thrust plate prosthesis revealed the lowest alteration of bone surface deformation after implantation.
INTERPRETATION: The comparably low micromotions of the thrust plate prosthesis and the short-stemmed prostheses should be conducive to osseous integration. The higher alteration of load transmission after implantation reveals a higher risk of stress shielding for the short-stemmed prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19307048     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  12 in total

1.  Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Matthias Woiczinski; Tobias F Schmidutz; Patrick Weber; Alexander C Paulus; Arnd Steinbrück; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Jens Gronewold; Sebastian Berner; Gavin Olender; Christof Hurschler; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses.

Authors:  Volker Brinkmann; Florian Radetzki; Karl Stefan Delank; David Wohlrab; Alexander Zeh
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-11

4.  The Short-term Clinical Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Short Metaphyseal Loading Femoral Stem.

Authors:  Yoo Wang Choi; Sung-Guk Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

5.  Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviour of Two Cementless Short Stems for Hip Replacement: Linea Anatomic and Minihip.

Authors:  Sergio Gabarre; Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Luis Gracia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Thomas Graf; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Andrea Bauer-Melnyk; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a bone-conserving short-stem implant: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Fottner; Farhad Mazoochian
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-20

8.  Changes in strain patterns after implantation of a short stem with metaphyseal anchorage compared to a standard stem: an experimental study in synthetic bone.

Authors:  Jens Gronewold; Sebastian Berner; Gavin Olender; Christof Hurschler; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski; Thilo Floerkemeier
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-18

9.  Comparisons of the surface micromotions of cementless femoral prosthesis in the horizontal and vertical levels: a network analysis of biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Bomin Wang; Qinghu Li; Jinlei Dong; Dongsheng Zhou; Fanxiao Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Metaphyseal anchoring short stem hip arthroplasty provides a more physiological load transfer: a comparative finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Yan Chevalier; Fanxiao Liu; Xingyi Hua; Anna Schreiner; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.