Literature DB >> 19306918

Multifunctionality dominantly determines the rate of human housekeeping and tissue specific interacting protein evolution.

Soumita Podder1, Pamela Mukhopadhyay, Tapash Chandra Ghosh.   

Abstract

Elucidation of the determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution is one of the great challenges in evolutionary biology. It has been proposed that housekeeping genes are evolutionarily slower than tissue specific genes. In the present communication, we have examined different determinants that influence the evolutionary rate variation in human housekeeping and tissue specific proteins present in protein-protein interaction network. Studies on yeast proteome, revealed a predominant role of protein connectivity in determining the rate of protein evolution. However, in human, we did not observe any significant influence of protein connectivity on its evolutionary rate. Rather, a significant impact of the proportion of protein's interacting length (amount of protein interface involved in interaction with its partners), expression level and multifunctionality has been observed in determining the rate of protein evolution. We also observed that multi interface proteins are evolutionarily conserved between housekeeping and tissue specific genes and it has been found that the average number of biological processes they associated in these two sets of genes is similar. Moreover, single interface proteins in housekeeping genes evolve more slowly as compared to tissue specific genes owing to their involvement in different number of biological processes. Partial correlation analysis suggests that the relative importance of three individual factors in determining the evolutionary rate variation between housekeeping and tissue specific proteins is in the order of protein multifunctionality>protein expression level>interacting protein length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306918     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  17 in total

1.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Three independent determinants of protein evolutionary rate.

Authors:  Sun Shim Choi; Sridhar Hannenhalli
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Understanding the effect of secondary structures and aggregation on human protein folding class evolution.

Authors:  Tina Begum; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Protein complex forming ability is favored over the features of interacting partners in determining the evolutionary rates of proteins in the yeast protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Sandip Chakraborty; Bratati Kahali; Tapash C Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-11-12

5.  On the quest for selective constraints shaping the expressivity of the genes casting retropseudogenes in human.

Authors:  Kamalika Sen; Soumita Podder; Tapash C Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Identification of human housekeeping genes and tissue-selective genes by microarray meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Wei Chang; Wei-Chung Cheng; Chaang-Ray Chen; Wun-Yi Shu; Min-Lung Tsai; Ching-Lung Huang; Ian C Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evolutionary dynamics of human autoimmune disease genes and malfunctioned immunological genes.

Authors:  Soumita Podder; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Lineage-specific sequence evolution and exon edge conservation partially explain the relationship between evolutionary rate and expression level in A. thaliana.

Authors:  Stephen J Bush; Paula X Kover; Araxi O Urrutia
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Do housekeeping genes exist?

Authors:  Yijuan Zhang; Ding Li; Bingyun Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolutionary rate heterogeneity of core and attachment proteins in yeast protein complexes.

Authors:  Sandip Chakraborty; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.