BACKGROUND: Few weight loss surgery trials have evaluated the changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) relative to obese individuals not participating in weight loss interventions. In a prospective study at a bariatric surgery practice, we evaluated the 2-year changes in HRQOL in gastric bypass patients compared with 2 severely obese groups who did not undergo surgical weight loss. METHODS: A total of 308 gastric bypass patients were compared with 253 individuals who sought but did not undergo gastric bypass and 272 population-based obese individuals using the weight-related (Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite) and general (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey) HRQOL questionnaires at baseline and 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The percentage of weight loss was 34.2% for the gastric bypass and 1.4% for the no gastric bypass groups, with a .5% gain for population-based obese group. Both measures of HRQOL showed greater improvements for the gastric bypass group, even after controlling for baseline differences. Effect sizes for changes in physical and weight-related HRQOL were very large for gastric bypass, but small to medium for the 2 comparison groups. Effect sizes for changes in the psychosocial aspects of HRQOL were moderate to very large for gastric bypass, but small for the 2 comparison groups. Of the gastric bypass patients, 97% had meaningful improvements in the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite total score compared with 43% of the no gastric bypass group and 30% of the population-based obese group. CONCLUSION: Dramatic improvements had occurred in weight-related and physical HRQOL for gastric bypass patients at 2 years after surgery compared with 2 severely obese groups who had not undergone surgery. These results support the effectiveness of gastric bypass surgery in improving patients' HRQOL.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few weight loss surgery trials have evaluated the changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) relative to obese individuals not participating in weight loss interventions. In a prospective study at a bariatric surgery practice, we evaluated the 2-year changes in HRQOL in gastric bypass patients compared with 2 severely obese groups who did not undergo surgical weight loss. METHODS: A total of 308 gastric bypass patients were compared with 253 individuals who sought but did not undergo gastric bypass and 272 population-based obese individuals using the weight-related (Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite) and general (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey) HRQOL questionnaires at baseline and 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The percentage of weight loss was 34.2% for the gastric bypass and 1.4% for the no gastric bypass groups, with a .5% gain for population-based obese group. Both measures of HRQOL showed greater improvements for the gastric bypass group, even after controlling for baseline differences. Effect sizes for changes in physical and weight-related HRQOL were very large for gastric bypass, but small to medium for the 2 comparison groups. Effect sizes for changes in the psychosocial aspects of HRQOL were moderate to very large for gastric bypass, but small for the 2 comparison groups. Of the gastric bypass patients, 97% had meaningful improvements in the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite total score compared with 43% of the no gastric bypass group and 30% of the population-based obese group. CONCLUSION: Dramatic improvements had occurred in weight-related and physical HRQOL for gastric bypass patients at 2 years after surgery compared with 2 severely obese groups who had not undergone surgery. These results support the effectiveness of gastric bypass surgery in improving patients' HRQOL.
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ted D Adams; Erick Avelar; Tom Cloward; Ross D Crosby; Robert J Farney; Richard Gress; R Chad Halverson; Paul N Hopkins; Ronette L Kolotkin; Michael J Lamonte; Sheldon Litwin; Robert T Nuttall; Robert Pendleton; Wayne Rosamond; Steven C Simper; Sherman C Smith; Michael Strong; James M Walker; Gail Wiebke; Frank G Yanowitz; Steven C Hunt Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: R R Williams; S C Hunt; G K Barlow; R M Chamberlain; A D Weinberg; H P Cooper; J P Carbonari; A M Gotto Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; David B Sarwer; Anthony N Fabricatore; LaShanda Jones; Rebecca Stack; Noel S Williams Journal: Med Clin North Am Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.456
Authors: Angela Marinilli Pinto; Leslee L Subak; Sanae Nakagawa; Eric Vittinghoff; Rena R Wing; John W Kusek; William H Herman; Delia Smith West; Miriam Kuppermann Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-12-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hilde Risstad; Torgeir T Søvik; Stephen Hewitt; Jon A Kristinsson; Morten W Fagerland; Tomm Bernklev; Tom Mala Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Mustafa Raoof; Ingmar Näslund; Eva Rask; Jan Karlsson; Magnus Sundbom; David Edholm; F Anders Karlsson; Felicity Svensson; Eva Szabo Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.129