Literature DB >> 19306029

Effect of rotator cuff dysfunction on the initial mechanical stability of cementless glenoid components.

Daniel R Suárez1, Edward R Valstar, Jacqueline C van der Linden, Fred van Keulen, Piet M Rozing.   

Abstract

The functional outcome of shoulder replacement is related to the condition of the rotator cuff. Rotator cuff disease is a common problem in candidates for total shoulder arthroplasty; this study relates the functional status of the rotator cuff to the initial stability of a cementless glenoid implant. A 3D finite element model of a complete scapula was used to quantify the effect of a dysfunctional rotator cuff in terms of bone-implant interface micromotions when the implant is physiologically loaded shortly after surgery. Four rotator cuff conditions (from fully intact to progressively ruptured rotator cuff tendons) as well as two bone qualities were simulated in a model. Micromotions were significantly larger in the worst modeled cuff dysfunction (i.e. the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons were fully dysfunctional). Micromotions were also significantly different between conditions with healthy and poor bone quality. The implant's initial stability was hardly influenced by a dysfunctional supraspinatus alone. However, when the infraspinatus was also affected, the glenohumeral joint force was displaced to the component's rim resulting in larger micromotions and instability of the implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306029     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0475-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  19 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of tendon transfers for massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  D J Magermans; E K J Chadwick; H E J Veeger; F C T van der Helm; P M Rozing
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effectiveness of tendon transfers for massive rotator cuff tears: a simulation study.

Authors:  D J Magermans; E K J Chadwick; H E J Veeger; P M Rozing; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment.

Authors:  B S Ramamurti; T E Orr; C R Bragdon; J D Lowenstein; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-08

4.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density.

Authors:  J C Rice; S C Cowin; J A Bowman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density.

Authors:  M B Schaffler; D B Burr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The influence of rotator cuff disease on the results of shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Aziz Boulahia; Jean-Francois Kempf; Pascal Boileau; Chantal Nemoz; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Nonconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W P Barrett; T S Thornhill; W H Thomas; E M Gebhart; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; J M Lee; C Maniatopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis.

Authors:  R H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  An analysis of factors affecting the long-term results of total shoulder arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; A E Inglis; V M Goldberg; C S Ranawat; M P Figgie; J M Wile
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

1.  Shoulder biomechanics: today's consensus and tomorrow's perspectives.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; H E J DirkJan Veeger
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Clinical applications of musculoskeletal modelling for the shoulder and upper limb.

Authors:  Bart Bolsterlee; Dirkjan H E J Veeger; Edward K Chadwick
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Development of a comprehensive musculoskeletal model of the shoulder and elbow.

Authors:  A Asadi Nikooyan; H E J Veeger; E K J Chadwick; M Praagman; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Number of pegs influence focal stress distributions and micromotion in glenoid implants: a finite element study.

Authors:  Abdul Hadi Abdul Wahab; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Muhammad Noor Harun; Tunku Kamarul; Ardiyansyah Syahrom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.