Literature DB >> 19304997

The molecular biology of seasonal flowering-responses in Arabidopsis and the cereals.

Aaron Greenup1, W James Peacock, Elizabeth S Dennis, Ben Trevaskis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) play key roles in regulating seasonal flowering-responses to synchronize flowering with optimal conditions. FT is a promoter of flowering activated by long days and by warm conditions. FLC represses FT to delay flowering until plants experience winter. SCOPE: The identification of genes controlling flowering in cereals allows comparison of the molecular pathways controlling seasonal flowering-responses in cereals with those of arabidopsis. The role of FT has been conserved between arabidopsis and cereals; FT-like genes trigger flowering in response to short days in rice or long days in temperate cereals, such as wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare). Many varieties of wheat and barley require vernalization to flower but FLC-like genes have not been identified in cereals. Instead, VERNALIZATION2 (VRN2) inhibits long-day induction of FT-like1 (FT1) prior to winter. VERNALIZATION1 (VRN1) is activated by low-temperatures during winter to repress VRN2 and to allow the long-day response to occur in spring. In rice (Oryza sativa) a VRN2-like gene Ghd7, which influences grain number, plant height and heading date, represses the FT-like gene Heading date 3a (Hd3a) in long days, suggesting a broader role for VRN2-like genes in regulating day-length responses in cereals. Other genes, including Early heading date (Ehd1), Oryza sativa MADS51 (OsMADS51) and INDETERMINATE1 (OsID1) up-regulate Hd3a in short days. These genes might account for the different day-length response of rice compared with the temperate cereals. No genes homologous to VRN2, Ehd1, Ehd2 or OsMADS51 occur in arabidopsis.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that different genes regulate FT orthologues to elicit seasonal flowering-responses in arabidopsis and the cereals. This highlights the need for more detailed study into the molecular basis of seasonal flowering-responses in cereal crops or in closely related model plants such as Brachypodium distachyon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304997      PMCID: PMC2685306          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  103 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time.

Authors:  U Johanson; J West; C Lister; S Michaels; R Amasino; C Dean
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  P Suárez-López; K Wheatley; F Robson; H Onouchi; F Valverde; G Coupland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  HvVRN2 responds to daylength, whereas HvVRN1 is regulated by vernalization and developmental status.

Authors:  Ben Trevaskis; Megan N Hemming; W James Peacock; Elizabeth S Dennis
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence.

Authors:  Takato Imaizumi; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Stephan Wenkel; Franziska Turck; Kamy Singer; Lionel Gissot; José Le Gourrierec; Alon Samach; George Coupland
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation.

Authors:  C C Sheldon; J E Burn; P P Perez; J Metzger; J A Edwards; W J Peacock; E S Dennis
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize.

Authors:  Olga N Danilevskaya; Xin Meng; Zhenglin Hou; Evgueni V Ananiev; Carl R Simmons
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Antagonistic regulation of flowering-time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs.

Authors:  Shelley R Hepworth; Federico Valverde; Dean Ravenscroft; Aidyn Mouradov; George Coupland
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OsMADS50, the putative SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in rice.

Authors:  Shinyoung Lee; Joonyul Kim; Jong-Jin Han; Min-Jung Han; Gynheung An
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 10.  The control of flowering in time and space.

Authors:  Katja E Jaeger; Alexander Graf; Philip A Wigge
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  96 in total

1.  Multiple exposures to drought 'train' transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Yong Ding; Michael Fromm; Zoya Avramova
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Genetic and physiological bases for phenological responses to current and predicted climates.

Authors:  A M Wilczek; L T Burghardt; A R Cobb; M D Cooper; S M Welch; J Schmitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mutations in the Arabidopsis homolog of LST8/GβL, a partner of the target of Rapamycin kinase, impair plant growth, flowering, and metabolic adaptation to long days.

Authors:  Manon Moreau; Marianne Azzopardi; Gilles Clément; Thomas Dobrenel; Chloé Marchive; Charlotte Renne; Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette; Ludivine Taconnat; Jean-Pierre Renou; Christophe Robaglia; Christian Meyer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Identification of high-temperature-responsive genes in cereals.

Authors:  Megan N Hemming; Sally A Walford; Sarah Fieg; Elizabeth S Dennis; Ben Trevaskis
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Genome-wide analysis of spatiotemporal gene expression patterns during floral organ development in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Soo In Lee; Muthusamy Muthusamy; Muhammad Amjad Nawaz; Joon Ki Hong; Myung-Ho Lim; Jin A Kim; Mi-Jeong Jeong
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Expression of flowering-time genes in soybean E1 near-isogenic lines under short and long day conditions.

Authors:  Dhiraj Thakare; Saratha Kumudini; Randy D Dinkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Fine mapping and haplotype structure analysis of a major flowering time quantitative trait locus on maize chromosome 10.

Authors:  Sébastien Ducrocq; Catherine Giauffret; Delphine Madur; Valérie Combes; Fabrice Dumas; Sophie Jouanne; Denis Coubriche; Philippe Jamin; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  PHYTOCHROME C is an essential light receptor for photoperiodic flowering in the temperate grass, Brachypodium distachyon.

Authors:  Daniel P Woods; Thomas S Ream; Gregory Minevich; Oliver Hobert; Richard M Amasino
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Identification and molecular characterization of a Brachypodium distachyon GIGANTEA gene: functional conservation in monocot and dicot plants.

Authors:  Shin-Young Hong; Sangmin Lee; Pil Joon Seo; Moon-Sik Yang; Chung-Mo Park
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Supermodels: sorghum and maize provide mutual insight into the genetics of flowering time.

Authors:  E S Mace; C H Hunt; D R Jordan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.