Literature DB >> 19304618

A multistream model of visual word recognition.

Philip A Allen1, Albert F Smith, Mei-Ching Lien, Kevin P Kaut, Angie Canfield.   

Abstract

Four experiments are reported that test a multistream model of visual word recognition, which associates letter-level and word-level processing channels with three known visual processing streams isolated in macaque monkeys: the magno-dominated (MD) stream, the interblob-dominated (ID) stream, and the blob-dominated (BD) stream (Van Essen & Anderson, 1995). We show that mixing the color of adjacent letters of words does not result in facilitation of response times or error rates when the spatial-frequency pattern of a whole word is familiar. However, facilitation does occur when the spatial-frequency pattern of a whole word is not familiar. This pattern of results is not due to different luminance levels across the different-colored stimuli and the background because isoluminant displays were used. Also, the mixed-case, mixed-hue facilitation occurred when different display distances were used (Experiments 2 and 3), so this suggests that image normalization can adjust independently of object size differences. Finally, we show that this effect persists in both spaced and unspaced conditions (Experiment 4)--suggesting that inappropriate letter grouping by hue cannot account for these results. These data support a model of visual word recognition in which lower spatial frequencies are processed first in the more rapid MD stream. The slower ID and BD streams may process some lower spatial frequency information in addition to processing higher spatial frequency information, but these channels tend to lose the processing race to recognition unless the letter string is unfamiliar to the MD stream--as with mixed-case presentation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304618     DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.2.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

1.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

2.  Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

3.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Effective connectivity of visual word recognition and homophone orthographic errors.

Authors:  Joan Guàrdia-Olmos; Maribel Peró-Cebollero; Daniel Zarabozo-Hurtado; Andrés A González-Garrido; Esteve Gudayol-Ferré
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-20

5.  Is the masked priming same-different task a pure measure of prelexical processing?

Authors:  Andrew N Kelly; Walter J B van Heuven; Nicola J Pitchford; Timothy Ledgeway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The visual magnocellular-dorsal dysfunction in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia impedes Chinese character recognition.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Yi Qian; Hong-Yan Bi; Max Coltheart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Eye movements reveal effects of visual content on eye guidance and lexical access during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Processing visual words with numbers: electrophysiological evidence for semantic activation.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip Allen; Nicole Martin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

10.  Word-decoding as a function of temporal processing in the visual system.

Authors:  Steven R Holloway; José E Náñez; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.