Literature DB >> 19303834

Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.

Piyush Durani1, D A McGrouther, M W J Ferguson.   

Abstract

Patients can have wide-ranging problems related to scars, in terms of cosmesis, function, symptoms, psychological problems and overall quality of life issues. A range of treatments have been recommended for problematic scarring, however it has been acknowledged that the evidence base for most of the recommendations for scar therapy is limited, with few studies using validated measures of scar assessment in generating data. This review critically evaluates the subjective scar assessment scales developed to date and provides an insight into developments required in this area for the future. The principles of psychometric theory are discussed as a means of developing reliable and valid outcome measures and these are also applicable for measuring outcomes in other fields of plastic surgery research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19303834     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  32 in total

1.  Quantification of the physical properties of keloid and hypertrophic scars using the Vesmeter novel sensing device.

Authors:  Ahmatjan Niyaz; Hajime Matsumura; Katsueki Watanabe; Tetsukazu Hamamoto; Takayasu Matsusawa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Reconstruction after skin cancer excision through a dermal induction template: our experience.

Authors:  Maria G Onesti; Pasquale Fino; Paolo Fioramonti; Vittoria Amorosi; Nicolò Scuderi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars.

Authors:  M Dordea; S R Aspinall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; H Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes following laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Shogo Inoue; Kenichiro Ikeda; Kanao Kobayashi; Mitsuru Kajiwara; Jun Teishima; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Cutaneous Scar Prevention and Management: Overview of current therapies.

Authors:  Sultan Al-Shaqsi; Taimoor Al-Bulushi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-02-02

7.  Retropubic, laparoscopic and mini-laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of patient scar satisfaction.

Authors:  Carmelo Quattrone; Antonio Cicione; Carlos Oliveira; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Cantiello; Vincenzo Mirone; Marco De Sio; Luca Carrubbo; Rocco Damiano; Carlo Pavone; Estevão Lima
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Population perception of surgical approach in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Shogo Inoue; Mitsuru Kajiwara; Jun Teishima; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.

Authors:  Regina Fearmonti; Jennifer Bond; Detlev Erdmann; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-06-21

10.  Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Peter B van den Boezem; Simone Velthuis; Harm J Lourens; Rahul A K Samlal; Miguel A Cuesta; Colin Sietses
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.