Literature DB >> 19302392

Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Marc Schätzle1, Roland Männchen, Ulrike Balbach, Christoph H F Hämmerle, Helge Toutenburg, Ronald E Jung.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this randomized-controlled clinical study was to examine stability changes of palatal implants with chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched (modSLA) titanium surface compared with a standard SLA surface, during the early stages of bone healing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty adult volunteers were recruited and randomly assigned to the test group (modSLA surface) and to the control group (SLA surface). The test and control implants had the same microscopic and macroscopic topography, but differed in surface chemistry. To document implant stability changes resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed at implant insertion, at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 70 and 84 days thereafter. RFA values were expressed as an implant stability quotient (ISQ).
RESULTS: Immediately after implant installation, the ISQ values for both surfaces tested were not significantly different and yielded mean values of 73.8+/-5 for the control and 72.7+/-3.9 for the test surface. In the first 2 weeks after implant installation, both groups showed only small changes and thereafter a decreasing trend in the mean ISQ levels. In the test group, after 28 days a tendency towards increasing ISQ values was observed and 42 days after surgery the ISQ values corresponded to those after implant insertion. For the SLA-control group, the trend changed after 35 days and yielded ISQ values corresponding to the baseline after 63 days. After 12 weeks of observation, the test surface yielded significantly higher stability values of 77.8+/-1.9 compared with the control implants of 74.5+/-3.9, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results support the potential for chemical modification of the SLA surface to positively influence the biologic process of osseointegration and to decrease the healing time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19302392     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01694.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

1.  Interactions between endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  Thomas Ziebart; Anne Schnell; Christian Walter; Peer W Kämmerer; Andreas Pabst; Karl M Lehmann; Johanna Ziebart; Marc O Klein; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.

Authors:  Safa Jambi; Tanya Walsh; Jonathan Sandler; Philip E Benson; Richard M Skeggs; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-19

3.  Engineered protein coatings to improve the osseointegration of dental and orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Jordan Raphel; Johan Karlsson; Silvia Galli; Ann Wennerberg; Christopher Lindsay; Matthew G Haugh; Jukka Pajarinen; Stuart B Goodman; Ryo Jimbo; Martin Andersson; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Mini-implant stability at the initial healing period: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Benedict Wilmes; Alexander Pauls; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Yasmin Ardebili; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-10

6.  A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps.

Authors:  Michel Dard; Makoto Shiota; Minoru Sanda; Yasutomo Yajima; Hideshi Sekine; Shohei Kasugai
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-04-04

7.  Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different titanium implant surface modifications: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Marta Satorres; Bruno Negri; Piedad Ramirez-Fernandez; Jose Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val; Jose Eduardo Maté-Sánchez; Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; Gerardo Gomez-Moreno; Marcus Abboud; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Early loading of hydrophilic titanium implants inserted in low-mineralized (D3 and D4) bone: one year results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Uwe Held; Dennis Rohner; Daniel Rothamel
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.151

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.