Literature DB >> 19301994

Going their separate ways: dissociation of hippocampal and dorsolateral prefrontal activation during episodic retrieval and post-retrieval processing.

Sarah L Israel1, Tyler M Seibert, Michelle L Black, James B Brewer.   

Abstract

Hippocampal activity is modulated during episodic memory retrieval. Most consistently, a relative increase in activity during confident retrieval is observed. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is also activated during retrieval, but may be more generally activated during cognitive-control processes. The "default network," regions activated during rest or internally focused tasks, includes the hippocampus, but not DLPFC. Therefore, DLPFC and the hippocampus should diverge during difficult tasks suppressing the default network. It is unclear, however, whether a difficult episodic memory retrieval task would suppress the default network due to difficulty or activate it due to internally directed attention. We hypothesized that a task requiring episodic retrieval followed by rumination on the retrieved item would increase DLPFC activity, but paradoxically reduce hippocampal activity due to concomitant suppression of the default network. In the present study, blocked and event-related fMRI were used to examine hippocampal activity during episodic memory recollection and postretrieval processing of paired associates. Subjects were asked to make living/nonliving judgments about items visually presented (classify) or items retrieved from memory (recall-classify). Active and passive baselines were used to differentiate task-related activity from default-network activity. During the "recall-classify" task, anterior hippocampal activity was selectively reduced relative to "classify" and baseline tasks, and this activity was inversely correlated with DLPFC. Reaction time was positively correlated with DLPFC activation and default-network/hippocampal suppression. The findings demonstrate that frontal and hippocampal activity are dissociated during difficult episodic retrieval tasks and reveal important considerations for interpreting hippocampal activity associated with successful episodic retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19301994     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Reaction time, memory strength, and fMRI activity during memory retrieval: Hippocampus and default network are differentially responsive during recollection and familiarity judgments.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  From a distance: implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection.

Authors:  Ozlem Ayduk; Ethan Kross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-05

3.  Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity.

Authors:  Lisa Aziz-Zadeh; Sook-Lei Liew; Francesco Dandekar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Expectation-driven changes in cortical functional connectivity influence working memory and long-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jacob Bollinger; Michael T Rubens; Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Parietal activity in episodic retrieval measured by fMRI and MEG.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Sarah I Gimbel; Donald J Hagler; James B Brewer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Effortful retrieval reduces hippocampal activity and impairs incidental encoding.

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Imbalance of incidental encoding across tasks: an explanation for non-memory-related hippocampal activations?

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-06-17

8.  Retrieval search and strength evoke dissociable brain activity during episodic memory recall.

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Search-Related Suppression of Hippocampus and Default Network Activity during Associative Memory Retrieval.

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; Sarah I Gimbel; Jena B Hales; James B Brewer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Elaboration versus suppression of cued memories: influence of memory recall instruction and success on parietal lobe, default network, and hippocampal activity.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.