Literature DB >> 19301874

Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.

Nathanael Weill1, Didier Rognan.   

Abstract

The present study introduces a novel low-dimensionality fingerprint encoding both ligand and target properties which is suitable to mine protein-ligand chemogenomic space. Whereas ligand properties have been represented by standard descriptors, protein cavities are encoded by a fixed length bit string describing pharmacophoric properties of a definite number of binding site residues. In order to simplify the cavity fingerprint, the concept was applied here to a unique family of targets (G protein-coupled receptors) with a homogeneous cavity description. Particular attention was given to set up data sets of really diverse protein-ligand pairs covering as exhaustively as possible both ligand and target spaces. Several machine learning classification algorithms were trained on two sets of roughly 200000 receptor-ligand fingerprints with a different definition of inactive decoys. Cross-validated models show excellent precision (>0.9) in distinguishing true from false pairs with a particular preference for support vector machine classifiers. When applied to two external test sets of GPCR ligands, the most predictive models were not those performing the best in the previous cross-validation. The ability to recover true GPCR ligands (ligand prediction mode) or true GPCRs (receptor prediction mode) depends on multiple parameters: the molecular complexity of the ligands, the chemical space from which ligand decoys are selected to generate false protein-ligand pairs, and the target space under consideration. In most cases, predicting ligands is easier than predicting receptors. Although receptor profiling is possible, it probably requires a more detailed description of the ligand-binding site. Noteworthy, protein-ligand fingerprints outperform the corresponding ligand fingerprints in mining the GPCR-ligand space. Since they can be applied to a much larger number of receptors than ligand-based fingerprints, protein-ligand fingerprints represent a novel and promising way to directly screen protein-ligand pairs in chemogenomic applications.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19301874     DOI: 10.1021/ci800447g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  17 in total

1.  Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes.

Authors:  Elisabet Gregori-Puigjané; Vincent Setola; Jérôme Hert; Brenda A Crews; John J Irwin; Eugen Lounkine; Lawrence Marnett; Bryan L Roth; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  A structural chemogenomics analysis of aminergic GPCRs: lessons for histamine receptor ligand design.

Authors:  A J Kooistra; S Kuhne; I J P de Esch; R Leurs; C de Graaf
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  GLASS: a comprehensive database for experimentally validated GPCR-ligand associations.

Authors:  Wallace K B Chan; Hongjiu Zhang; Jianyi Yang; Jeffrey R Brender; Junguk Hur; Arzucan Özgür; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Cross-pharmacology analysis of G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Ferran Briansó; Maria C Carrascosa; Tudor I Oprea; Jordi Mestres
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Computational chemogenomics: is it more than inductive transfer?

Authors:  J B Brown; Yasushi Okuno; Gilles Marcou; Alexandre Varnek; Dragos Horvath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  ChemProt: a disease chemical biology database.

Authors:  Olivier Taboureau; Sonny Kim Nielsen; Karine Audouze; Nils Weinhold; Daniel Edsgärd; Francisco S Roque; Irene Kouskoumvekaki; Alina Bora; Ramona Curpan; Thomas Skøt Jensen; Søren Brunak; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Predicting a small molecule-kinase interaction map: A machine learning approach.

Authors:  Fabian Buchwald; Lothar Richter; Stefan Kramer
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Insights into an original pocket-ligand pair classification: a promising tool for ligand profile prediction.

Authors:  Stéphanie Pérot; Leslie Regad; Christelle Reynès; Olivier Spérandio; Maria A Miteva; Bruno O Villoutreix; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Discovering associations in biomedical datasets by link-based associative classifier (LAC).

Authors:  Pulan Yu; David J Wild
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.