Literature DB >> 19301547

Survival and reoperation risk following bicuspid aortic valve-sparing root replacement.

Basar Sareyyupoglu1, Rakesh M Suri, Hartzell V Schaff, Joseph A Dearani, Richard C Daly, Thomas A Orszulak, Thoralf M Sundt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The mid-term outcome of aortic valve-sparing root replacement, reimplanting native bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves, is unclear.
METHODS: The records of 84 consecutive patients (66 men, 18 women; mean age 46.6 years) who had undergone aortic valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique between January 1997 and July 2006, were reviewed. Among the patients, 26 (31%) had Marfan syndrome and 14 (17%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. The mean follow up period was 4.1 years.
RESULTS: There were three early deaths (4%) and five late deaths (6%). Late survival (>30 days) at five and eight years was 95% and 88%, respectively. The presence of significant coronary artery disease (p = 0.001), a lower preoperative ejection fraction (p = 0.03) and older age (p = 0.04) were the only univariate predictors of death. Freedom from moderate-severe or severe (grade 3 or 4) aortic valve regurgitation at one and five years was 91% and 77%, respectively. Ten patients (12%) required aortic valve reoperation at a mean of 3.4 years after surgery (3/14 bicuspid, 7/70 tricuspid); however, only one reoperation was required among patients undergoing the initial surgery after the year 2000. Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at one and five years was 95% and 83%, respectively. The predischarge degree of aortic valve regurgitation was the sole univariate factor associated with aortic valve reoperation (p = 0.008). Bicuspid valve morphology was not a predictor of either recurrent aortic valve regurgitation, nor of aortic valve reoperation.
CONCLUSION: Bicuspid aortic valves may be safely spared by reimplantation during replacement of the aortic root, with similar mid-term durability as for tricuspid aortic valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19301547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  5 in total

1.  Bicuspidy does not affect reoperation risk following aortic valve reimplantation.

Authors:  Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Alessio Basciu; Enrico Citterio; Antioco Cappai; Diego Ornaghi; Giuseppe Tarelli; Fabrizio Settepani
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-02

2.  Geometric orientation of the aortic neoroot in patients with raphed bicuspid aortic valve disease undergoing primary cusp repair and a root reimplantation procedure.

Authors:  Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Wilson Y Szeto; Caroline M Komlo; Liam P Ryan; Tyler J Wallen; Robert C Gorman; Nimesh D Desai; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Comparison of outcomes following isolated repair of tricuspid versus bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Anatol Prinzing; Johannes Boehm; Magdalena Erlebach; Konstantinos Sideris; Ruediger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Influence of higher valve gradient on long-term outcome after aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Hunaid A Vohra; Robert N Whistance; Laurent de Kerchove; David Glineur; Philipe Noirhomme; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

5.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair in the setting of severe aortic insufficiency.

Authors:  Ziv Beckerman; Michael O Kayatta; LaRonica McPherson; Jose N Binongo; Yi Lasanajak; Bradley G Leshnower; Edward P Chen
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.