Literature DB >> 19300203

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: differentiation of malignant and benign tumors by endoscopic ultrasound findings of mural nodules.

Eizaburo Ohno1, Yoshiki Hirooka, Akihiro Itoh, Masatoshi Ishigami, Yoshiaki Katano, Naoki Ohmiya, Yasumasa Niwa, Hidemi Goto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs)have a wide pathologic spectrum and it is difficult to differentiate malignant from benign tumors. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of malignancy using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In our institute, main duct type and mixed type IPMNs, branch duct type IPMNs with mural nodules, and IPMNs with coexistent invasive ductal cancer were indications for surgery. Eighty-seven IPMNs (14 main duct, 25 mixed, and 48 branch duct type) were resected and CE-EUS findings were compared with pathologic findings. Twelve clinicopathological variables and CE-EUS morphologic findings were assessed.Mural nodules defined as blood flow supplied protrusions were classified into 4 types: type I: low papillary nodule, type II: polypoid nodule, type III:papillary nodule, and type IV: invasive nodule.
RESULTS: Forty-two, 26, 16, and 3 were pathologically diagnosed as adenoma,noninvasive carcinoma, invasive IPMNs, and coexistent invasive ductal cancer, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that types III/IV mural nodule (odds ratio = 10.8; 95% confidential intervals = 2.75-56.1) and symptomatic IPMNs (odds ratio = 4.31; 95% confidential intervals = 1.37-14.7) were significant for malignancy. For mural nodule diameter, invasive IPMNs were significantly larger, but types III and IV mural nodules were more frequently associated with malignancy, particularly invasive cancer, at 88.9% and 91.7%, respectively. The diagnosis of IPMNs with types III or IV mural nodule as malignant resulted in a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 92.9%, and accuracy of 75.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, new morphologic criteria were useful to identify the malignant potentials of IPMNs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19300203     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a189a8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  53 in total

1.  Comparison between MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating malignant from benign mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Young Kon Kim; Ji Hye Min; Woo Kyung Jeong; Seong Sook Hong; Hyun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  IPMN: surgical treatment.

Authors:  Reto M Käppeli; Sascha A Müller; Bianka Hummel; Christina Kruse; Philip Müller; Jürgen Fornaro; Alexander Wilhelm; Marcel Zadnikar; Bruno M Schmied; Ignazio Tarantino
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Managing Incidental Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jennifer Phan; V Raman Muthusamy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-06-09

4.  Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hirofumi Harima; Seiji Kaino; Shuhei Shinoda; Michitaka Kawano; Shigeyuki Suenaga; Isao Sakaida
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms after recurrent acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Yuki Arai; Kiichi Tamada; Shinichi Wada; Jun Ushio; Hisashi Hatanaka; Takeshi Tomiyama; Kentaro Sugano
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-15

6.  EUS for pancreas cysts: what should we be sampling?

Authors:  Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Clinical oncology for pancreatic and biliary cancers: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Yoshiki Hirooka; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Takuya Ishikawa; Yuya Itoh; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Naoki Ohmiya; Masatoshi Ishigami; Yoshiaki Katano; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

8.  Clinicopathological Meaning of Size of Main-Duct Dilatation in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of Pancreas: Proposal of a Simplified Morphological Classification Based on the Investigation on the Size of Main Pancreatic Duct.

Authors:  Mee Joo Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Selyeong Lee; Taesung Park; Seung Yeoun Lee; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Concomitant pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a patient with branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

Authors:  Joanna K Law; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Anne Marie Lennon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in digestive diseases.

Authors:  Yoshiki Hirooka; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Yuya Itoh; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hajime Sumi; Daijiro Hayashi; Naoki Ohmiya; Ryoji Miyahara; Masanao Nakamura; Kohei Funasaka; Masatoshi Ishigami; Yoshiaki Katano; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.