BACKGROUND: The 2012 consensus guideline on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) described a three-stage criteria involving main pancreatic duct (MPD) size with definitions of malignancy relevant for treatment decisions. Re-evaluation and simplification of this classification for clinicians are warranted. METHODS: Data from the Seoul National University Hospital of 375 consecutive patients with pathology-confirmed IPMN after surgery were analyzed. The association between clinicopathologic characteristics of IPMN and MPD size was assessed. The cut-off value of MPD size for a current definition of malignancy prediction was calculated. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was highest when the cut-off value of MPD size was 7 mm (area under the curve=0.7126). Dichotomizing IPMN into MPD≤7 mm versus MPD> mm, patient age (p=0.039), sex (p=0.001), presence of mural nodule (p<0.001), and invasiveness risk (13.2 vs. 39.8%, p<0.001) resulted in significantly different results. Mural nodule-negative patients with MPD>7 mm had a significantly lower 5-year survival rate than those with MPD≤7 mm (78.4 vs. 91.4%, p=0.006). Among patients with MPD size≤7 mm, elevated serum CA 19-9 and mural nodule were independent risk factors of malignancy. Patients with MPD size≤7 mm without these risk factors had malignancy risk of 2.6%. CONCLUSION: Using the definition of malignancy provided in the 2012 guideline, the MPD size> mm criterion was statistically driven. The current morphologic classification of IPMN can be simplified as branch-duct-predominant IPMN (MPD≤7 mm)' and main-duct-predominant IPMN (MPD> mm). Patients who are determined to have main-duct-predominant IPMN and branch-duct-predominant IPMN with elevated serum CA 19-9 or mural nodule are recommended to undergo surgical treatment.
BACKGROUND: The 2012 consensus guideline on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) described a three-stage criteria involving main pancreatic duct (MPD) size with definitions of malignancy relevant for treatment decisions. Re-evaluation and simplification of this classification for clinicians are warranted. METHODS: Data from the Seoul National University Hospital of 375 consecutive patients with pathology-confirmed IPMN after surgery were analyzed. The association between clinicopathologic characteristics of IPMN and MPD size was assessed. The cut-off value of MPD size for a current definition of malignancy prediction was calculated. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was highest when the cut-off value of MPD size was 7 mm (area under the curve=0.7126). Dichotomizing IPMN into MPD≤7 mm versus MPD> mm, patient age (p=0.039), sex (p=0.001), presence of mural nodule (p<0.001), and invasiveness risk (13.2 vs. 39.8%, p<0.001) resulted in significantly different results. Mural nodule-negative patients with MPD>7 mm had a significantly lower 5-year survival rate than those with MPD≤7 mm (78.4 vs. 91.4%, p=0.006). Among patients with MPD size≤7 mm, elevated serum CA 19-9 and mural nodule were independent risk factors of malignancy. Patients with MPD size≤7 mm without these risk factors had malignancy risk of 2.6%. CONCLUSION: Using the definition of malignancy provided in the 2012 guideline, the MPD size> mm criterion was statistically driven. The current morphologic classification of IPMN can be simplified as branch-duct-predominant IPMN (MPD≤7 mm)' and main-duct-predominant IPMN (MPD> mm). Patients who are determined to have main-duct-predominant IPMN and branch-duct-predominant IPMN with elevated serum CA 19-9 or mural nodule are recommended to undergo surgical treatment.
Authors: Dushyant V Sahani; Rajagopal Kadavigere; Michael Blake; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Gregory Y Lauwers; Peter F Hahn Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H Irie; H Honda; H Aibe; T Kuroiwa; K Yoshimitsu; K Shinozaki; K Yamaguchi; M Shimada; K Masuda Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Mee Joo Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Soo Jin Kim; Kyoung Bun Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon; Sun-Whe Kim Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Jin He; John L Cameron; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Kenzo Hirose; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Y H Andrew Wu; Atsushi Oba; Laurel Beaty; Kathryn L Colborn; Salvador Rodriguez Franco; Ben Harnke; Cheryl Meguid; Daniel Negrini; Roberto Valente; Steven Ahrendt; Richard D Schulick; Marco Del Chiaro Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 6.639