OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the effect of universal implementation of a clinic-based, psychosocial smoking cessation intervention for pregnant women. METHODS: We used data from US birth certificates (2005) and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2004) to estimate the number of women smoking at conception. To calculate the number of women eligible to receive the cessation intervention, we used estimates from the literature of the percentage of women who quit spontaneously (23%), entered prenatal care before the third trimester (96.5%), and disclosed smoking to their provider (75%). We used the pooled relative risk (RR) for continued smoking from the 2004 Cochrane Review as our measure of the intervention's effectiveness (RR = 0.94). RESULTS: We estimated that 944,240 women smoked at conception. Of these, 23.0% quit spontaneously, 6.3% quit with usual care, and an additional 3.3% quit because of the intervention, leaving 67.4% smoking throughout pregnancy. The calculated smoking prevalence in late pregnancy decreased from 16.4% to 15.6% because of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Universal implementation of a best-practice, clinic-based intervention would increase the total number of quitters but would not substantially reduce smoking prevalence among pregnant women.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the effect of universal implementation of a clinic-based, psychosocial smoking cessation intervention for pregnant women. METHODS: We used data from US birth certificates (2005) and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2004) to estimate the number of women smoking at conception. To calculate the number of women eligible to receive the cessation intervention, we used estimates from the literature of the percentage of women who quit spontaneously (23%), entered prenatal care before the third trimester (96.5%), and disclosed smoking to their provider (75%). We used the pooled relative risk (RR) for continued smoking from the 2004 Cochrane Review as our measure of the intervention's effectiveness (RR = 0.94). RESULTS: We estimated that 944,240 women smoked at conception. Of these, 23.0% quit spontaneously, 6.3% quit with usual care, and an additional 3.3% quit because of the intervention, leaving 67.4% smoking throughout pregnancy. The calculated smoking prevalence in late pregnancy decreased from 16.4% to 15.6% because of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Universal implementation of a best-practice, clinic-based intervention would increase the total number of quitters but would not substantially reduce smoking prevalence among pregnant women.
Authors: Deborah J Hennrikus; Harry A Lando; Maribet C McCarty; David Klevan; Neal Holtan; Jacquelyn A Huebsch; Sharon Jestus; Paul R Pentel; Donald Pine; Susan Sullivan; Karen Swenson; John Vessey Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: J S Kendrick; S C Zahniser; N Miller; N Salas; J Stine; P M Gargiullo; R L Floyd; F W Spierto; M Sexton; R W Metzger Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Denise M Levis; Brenda Stone-Wiggins; Michelle O'Hegarty; Van T Tong; Kara N D Polen; Cynthia H Cassell; Mary Council Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2014-09
Authors: Hannah H Chang; Jim Larson; Hannah Blencowe; Catherine Y Spong; Christopher P Howson; Sarah Cairns-Smith; Eve M Lackritz; Shoo K Lee; Elizabeth Mason; Andrew C Serazin; Salimah Walani; Joe Leigh Simpson; Joy E Lawn Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Oluwatosin Olaiya; Andrea J Sharma; Van T Tong; Deborah Dee; Celia Quinn; Israel T Agaku; Elizabeth J Conrey; Nicole M Kuiper; Glen A Satten Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Van T Tong; Patricia M Dietz; Lucinda J England; Sherry L Farr; Shin Y Kim; Denise D'Angelo; Jennifer M Bombard Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Catherine Chamberlain; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Sandy Oliver; Jenny R Caird; Susan M Perlen; Sandra J Eades; James Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-10-23