Gillian S Gould1, Christi Patten2, Marewa Glover3, Anette Kira4, Harshani Jayasinghe5,6. 1. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. School of Public Health, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. Independent Researcher, Manawatu, New Zealand. 5. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 6. Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women in socioeconomically disadvantaged circumstances, such as Indigenous women, have a high prevalence of smoking. Tobacco smoking is the most significant reversible risk factor for the health of Indigenous pregnant women and their babies. METHODS: As researchers working in this specialized area, we conducted a narrative review of the literature on smoking among Indigenous pregnant women in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. We summarize prevalence and factors influencing tobacco use, interventions, and evidence gaps for tobacco control and smoking cessation. Recommendations are made for future interventions, policy changes, and much-needed research. RESULTS: Common themes emerging across the four countries reveal opportunities for cross-cultural collaborative studies and trials. These include the social-normative use of tobacco as barriers to quitting in pregnancy and the need for evaluations of interventions at the family and community level. Socioeconomic disparities underscore the importance of enhancing the implementation and reach of strategies to prevent and reduce prenatal tobacco smoking among Indigenous women. Elders and community health care providers as role models for nontobacco use could be explored. Qualitative work is needed to understand the barriers and opportunities, such as cultural strengths supporting quitting tobacco to develop more effective approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Although a high-priority group, there remains a dearth of research on Indigenous women's smoking in pregnancy. Studies have assessed knowledge and attitudes to smoking in pregnancy, and small feasibility studies and a few empirical trials have been conducted. Recommendations for promising culturally appropriate cessation interventions have been made. Larger trials are warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Strategies to support quitting among pregnant Indigenous women need to be multifactorial and take account of the social determinants of smoking including historical antecedents, community norms, cultural strengths, and recognition of individual and community needs. Cross-country research collaborations have the potential to leverage funding, share expertise, and strengthen approaches to tackle an important and poorly attended health disparity that has a profound impact on the entire life course for Indigenous peoples.
INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women in socioeconomically disadvantaged circumstances, such as Indigenous women, have a high prevalence of smoking. Tobacco smoking is the most significant reversible risk factor for the health of Indigenous pregnant women and their babies. METHODS: As researchers working in this specialized area, we conducted a narrative review of the literature on smoking among Indigenous pregnant women in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. We summarize prevalence and factors influencing tobacco use, interventions, and evidence gaps for tobacco control and smoking cessation. Recommendations are made for future interventions, policy changes, and much-needed research. RESULTS: Common themes emerging across the four countries reveal opportunities for cross-cultural collaborative studies and trials. These include the social-normative use of tobacco as barriers to quitting in pregnancy and the need for evaluations of interventions at the family and community level. Socioeconomic disparities underscore the importance of enhancing the implementation and reach of strategies to prevent and reduce prenatal tobacco smoking among Indigenous women. Elders and community health care providers as role models for nontobacco use could be explored. Qualitative work is needed to understand the barriers and opportunities, such as cultural strengths supporting quitting tobacco to develop more effective approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Although a high-priority group, there remains a dearth of research on Indigenous women's smoking in pregnancy. Studies have assessed knowledge and attitudes to smoking in pregnancy, and small feasibility studies and a few empirical trials have been conducted. Recommendations for promising culturally appropriate cessation interventions have been made. Larger trials are warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Strategies to support quitting among pregnant Indigenous women need to be multifactorial and take account of the social determinants of smoking including historical antecedents, community norms, cultural strengths, and recognition of individual and community needs. Cross-country research collaborations have the potential to leverage funding, share expertise, and strengthen approaches to tackle an important and poorly attended health disparity that has a profound impact on the entire life course for Indigenous peoples.
Authors: Joan L Bottorff; Joanne Carey; Roberta Mowatt; Colleen Varcoe; Joy L Johnson; Peter Hutchinson; Debbie Sullivan; Wanda Williams; Dennis Wardman Journal: Health Place Date: 2009-05-10 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: David Tappin; Linda Bauld; David Purves; Kathleen Boyd; Lesley Sinclair; Susan MacAskill; Jennifer McKell; Brenda Friel; Alex McConnachie; Linda de Caestecker; Carol Tannahill; Andrew Radley; Tim Coleman Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-01-27
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; Caroline C Renner; Anne P Lanier; Rachel F Tyndale; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Bruce Lindgren; Irina Stepanov; Clifford H Watson; Connie S Sosnoff; Peyton Jacob Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rishi Caleyachetty; Christopher A Tait; Andre P Kengne; Camila Corvalan; Ricardo Uauy; Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Lucinda J England; Richard J Levine; James L Mills; Mark A Klebanoff; Kai F Yu; Sven Cnattingius Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Christi A Patten; Kathryn R Koller; Christie A Flanagan; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Christine A Hughes; Abbie W Wolfe; Paul A Decker; Kristin Fruth; Tabetha A Brockman; Molly Korpela; Diana Gamez; Carrie Bronars; Neil J Murphy; Dorothy Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Timothy K Thomas Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-10-12
Authors: Christi A Patten; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Sarah H Nash; Gretchen Day; Diana G Redwood; Julie A Beans; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans; Kathryn R Koller Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Christi A Patten; Harry A Lando; Chris A Desnoyers; Yvette Barrows; Joseph Klejka; Paul A Decker; Christine A Hughes; Martha J Bock; Rahnia Boyer; Kenneth Resnicow; Linda Burhansstipanov Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Christi A Patten; Kathryn R Koller; Christie A Flanagan; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Zoe T Merritt; Flora Sapp; Crystal D Meade; Christine A Hughes; Paul A Decker; Neil Murphy; Timothy K Thomas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christi A Patten; Harry A Lando; Chris A Desnoyers; Martha J Bock; Lucinda Alexie; Paul A Decker; Christine A Hughes; Kenneth Resnicow; Linda Burhansstipanov; Rahnia Boyer; Joseph Klejka Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christi A Patten; Harry Lando; Kenneth Resnicow; Paul A Decker; Christina M Smith; Marcelo M Hanza; Linda Burhansstipanov; Matthew Scott Journal: J Commun Healthc Date: 2018-07-16