Literature DB >> 19297651

Impact of pay for performance on quality of chronic disease management by social class group in England.

Danielle Crawley1, Anthea Ng, Arch G Mainous, Azeem Majeed, Christopher Millett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between social class and achievement of selected national audit targets for coronary heart disease (CHD), diabetes and hypertension in England before and after the introduction of a major pay for performance programme in 2004.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of 2003 and 2006 national survey data for respondents with CHD and diabetes and hypertension.
SETTING: England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Achievement of national audit targets for blood pressure, blood glucose and cholesterol control.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in achievement of blood pressure targets in individuals from manual and non-manual occupational groups with diabetes (2003: 65.9% v 60.3%, 2006: 67.6% v 69.7%) or hypertension (2003: 66.2% v 66.2%, 2006: 72.8% v 71.9%) before or after the introduction of pay for performance. Achievement of the cholesterol target was also similar in individuals from manual and non-manual groups with diabetes (2003: 52.5% v 46.6%, 2006: 68.7% v 70.5%) or CHD (2003: 54.3% v 53.3%, 2006: 68.6% v 71.3%). Differences in achievement of the blood pressure target in CHD [75.8% v 84.5%; AOR 0.44 (0.21-0.90)] were evident between manual and non-manual occupational groups after the introduction of pay for performance.
CONCLUSION: The quality of chronic disease management in England was broadly equitable between socioeconomic groups before this major pay for performance programme and remained so after its introduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19297651      PMCID: PMC2746849          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.080389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  15 in total

1.  The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  Mark Ashworth; Paul Seed; David Armstrong; Stevo Durbaba; Roger Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Will pay-for-performance and quality reporting affect health care disparities?

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Arthur Elster; Andy Eisenberg; Evelyn Lewis; John Montgomery; Diana Ramos
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Deprivation and quality of primary care services: evidence for persistence of the inverse care law from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  G McLean; M Sutton; B Guthrie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  M E Seddon; M N Marshall; S M Campbell; M O Roland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

5.  Impact of pay for performance on ethnic disparities in intermediate outcomes for diabetes: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Christopher Millett; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Sonia Saxena; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care?

Authors:  Steven M Asch; Eve A Kerr; Joan Keesey; John L Adams; Claude M Setodji; Shaista Malik; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Diabetes prevalence, process of care and outcomes in relation to practice size, caseload and deprivation: national cross-sectional study in primary care.

Authors:  Christopher Millett; Josip Car; Darren Eldred; Kamlesh Khunti; Arch G Mainous; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Association of deprivation, ethnicity, and sex with quality indicators for diabetes: population based survey of 53,000 patients in primary care.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Shaun O'Hanlon; Carol Coupland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-17

9.  The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5.

Authors:  Mark Ashworth; David Armstrong
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Practice size, caseload, deprivation and quality of care of patients with coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in primary care: national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sonia Saxena; Josip Car; Darren Eldred; Michael Soljak; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cardiovascular multimorbidity: the effect of ethnicity on prevalence and risk factor management.

Authors:  Rohini Mathur; Sally A Hull; Ellena Badrick; John Robson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Provider and patient directed financial incentives to improve care and outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Ilona S Lorincz; Brittany C T Lawson; Judith A Long
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pauline Boeckxstaens; Delphine De Smedt; Jan De Maeseneer; Lieven Annemans; Sara Willems
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  The effects of pay for performance on disparities in stroke, hypertension, and coronary heart disease management: interrupted time series study.

Authors:  John Tayu Lee; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Azeem Majeed; Christopher Millett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wei; Haitao Li; Nan Yang; Samuel Y S Wong; Onikepe Owolabi; Jianguang Xu; Leiyu Shi; Jinling Tang; Donald Li; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comparison of the quality of hypertension management in primary care between Shanghai and Shenzhen: a cohort study of 3196 patients.

Authors:  Haitao Li; Xiaolin Wei; Martin C Wong; Nan Yang; Samuel Y Wong; Xiangqian Lao; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Equity impact of a choice reform and change in reimbursement system in primary care in Stockholm County Council.

Authors:  Janne Agerholm; Daniel Bruce; Antonio Ponce de Leon; Bo Burström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Perceived Quality of Primary Care by Hypertensive Patients in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China.

Authors:  Haitao Li; Xiaolin Wei; Martin Chi-Sang Wong; Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong; Nan Yang; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Is the distribution of care quality provided under pay-for-performance equitable? Evidence from the Advancing Quality programme in England.

Authors:  Thomas Mason; Yiu-Shing Lau; Matthew Sutton
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.