Literature DB >> 19295299

Current aspects of perioperative fluid handling in vascular surgery.

Matthias Jacob1, Daniel Chappell, Markus W Hollmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Perioperative fluid management influences patient outcome. Vascular surgery unites various surgical procedures, mainly with a high impact on patients who often have relevant preexisting illnesses. There are only scarce data on this specialty, forcing the clinician to extrapolate existing data when planning perioperative fluid management. This review aims to summarize the underlying facts. RECENT
FINDINGS: Perioperative insensible perspiration does not exceed 1 ml/kg per hour. A third space shift does not exist; therefore, its primary substitution is erroneous. Rather, a crystalloid fluid excess causes a tremendous shift towards the interstitial space. Colloidal volume effects are context sensitive, that is, only their use as a substitute when blood or plasma loss occurs leads to maintenance within the circulatory space. Colloidal hypervolaemia and surgical trauma both have the potential to deteriorate the vascular barrier, leading to plasma loss into the interstitial space. Current perioperative fluid therapy should aim to maintain normovolaemia of the individual body fluid compartments as far as possible. This might be achieved by combining a protocol-based replacement of extracellular losses (urinary output plus insensible perspiration) with isotonic balanced crystalloids and blood volume optimization using isooncotic colloids.
SUMMARY: The basis of fluid therapy in vascular surgery is a careful differential indication of the respective classes of preparations. A goal-directed approach might help to avoid hypovolaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19295299     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831f1c65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx in clinical settings: searching for the sheddases.

Authors:  Bernhard F Becker; Matthias Jacob; Stephanie Leipert; Andrew H J Salmon; Daniel Chappell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Hemodynamic goal-directed therapy. A review.

Authors:  S Romagnoli; S M Romano; S Bevilacqua; C Lazzeri; F Ciappi; D Dini; C Pratesi; G F Gensini
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2009

4.  Intraoperative Fluid Restriction in Pancreatic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ganapathy van Samkar; Wietse J Eshuis; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Benedikt Preckel; Stefan de Hert; Dirk J Gouma; Markus W Hollmann; Olivier R C Busch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), a marker of positive fluid balance in critically ill patients: results of the ENVOL study.

Authors:  Bernard Vigué; Pierre-Etienne Leblanc; Frédérique Moati; Eric Pussard; Hussam Foufa; Aurore Rodrigues; Samy Figueiredo; Anatole Harrois; Jean-Xavier Mazoit; Homa Rafi; Jacques Duranteau
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Liberal versus Modified Intraoperative Fluid Management in Abdominal-flap Breast Reconstructions. A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Thomas Sjöberg; Anmar Numan; Louis de Weerd
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.