Literature DB >> 19295059

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.

Suresh Kumar1, Amaresh Chandra, K C Pandey.   

Abstract

Introduction of DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) and following move towards indiscriminate use of synthetic chemical insecticides led to the contamination of water and food sources, poisoning of non-target beneficial insects and development of insect-pests resistant to the chemical insecticides. Increased public concems about the adverse environmental effects of indiscriminate use of chemical insecticides prompted search of altemative methods for insect-pest control. One of the promising alternatives has been the use of biological control agents. There is well-documented history of safe application of Bt (B. thuringiensis, a gram positive soil bacterium) as effective biopesticides and a number of reports of expression of delta-endotoxin gene(s) in crop plants are available. Only a few insecticidal sprays are required on Bt transgenic crops, which not only save cost and time, but also reduce health risks. Insects exhibit remarkable ability to develop resistance to different insecticidal compounds, which raises concern about the unsystematic use of Bt transgenic technology also. Though resistance to Bt products among insect species under field conditions has been rare, laboratory studies show that insects are capable of developing high levels of resistance to one ormore Cry proteins. Now it is generally agreed that 'high-dose/refuge strategy' is the most promising and practical approach to prolong the effectiveness of Bt toxins. Although manybiosafety concerns, ethical and moral issues exist, area under Bt transgenic crops is rapidly increasing and they are cultivated on more than 32 million hectares world over Even after reservation of European Union (EU) for acceptance of geneticaly modified (GM) crops, 6 out of 25 countries have already adopted Bt crops and many otherindustrial countries will adopt Bt transgenic crops in near future. While the modem biotechnology has been recognized to have a great potential for the promotion of human well-being, adoption of biosafety protocol is necessary to protect human health and environment from the possible adverse effects of the products of genetic engineering. The debate between proponents and opponents of GM technology has created major obstacles in hamessing benefits of the technology It has now become clear that transgenics willbe accepted by the public only when doubts related with general risks and environmental safety are adequately dispelled. Thus, there is need to organize public awareness and present the benefits of Bt transgenic crops to improve social attitude for their rational deployment. In this review, an attempt has been made to discuss social and environmental safety issues of Bt transgenic crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19295059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Biol        ISSN: 0254-8704


  33 in total

1.  Association of Cry1Ac toxin resistance in Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) with increased alkaline phosphatase levels in the midgut lumen.

Authors:  Silvia Caccia; William J Moar; Jayadevi Chandrashekhar; Cris Oppert; Konasale J Anilkumar; Juan Luis Jurat-Fuentes; Juan Ferré
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biotechnological advancements in alfalfa improvement.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Targeted DNA insertion in plants.

Authors:  Oliver Xiaoou Dong; Pamela C Ronald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Food safety knowledge on the Bt mutant protein Cry8Ka5 employed in the development of coleopteran-resistant transgenic cotton plants.

Authors:  Davi F Farias; Ad A C M Peijnenburg; Maria F Grossi-de-Sá; Ana F U Carvalho
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.269

5.  Use of Redundant Exclusion PCR To Identify a Novel Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8 Toxin Gene from Pooled Genomic DNA.

Authors:  Fengjiao Zhang; Changlong Shu; Neil Crickmore; Yanqiu Li; Fuping Song; Chunqin Liu; Zhibao Chen; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Transgenic rice expressing the cry2AX1 gene confers resistance to multiple lepidopteran pests.

Authors:  M Chakraborty; P Sairam Reddy; G Mustafa; G Rajesh; V M Laxmi Narasu; V Udayasuriyan; Debashis Rana
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Chloroplast-targeted expression of the codon-optimized truncated cry1Ah gene in transgenic tobacco confers a high level of protection against insects.

Authors:  Xiuying Li; Shengyan Li; Zhihong Lang; Jie Zhang; Li Zhu; Dafang Huang
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.570

8.  Lasting consequences of psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli L.) infestation on tomato defense, gene expression, and growth.

Authors:  Kyle Harrison; Azucena Mendoza-Herrera; Julien Gad Levy; Cecilia Tamborindeguy
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Cloning, characterization, and expression of a new cry1Ab gene from DOR Bt-1, an indigenous isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  V Prathap Reddy; N Narasimha Rao; P S Vimala Devi; S Sivaramakrishnan; M Lakshmi Narasu; V Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.695

10.  Midgut microbiota and host immunocompetence underlie Bacillus thuringiensis killing mechanism.

Authors:  Silvia Caccia; Ilaria Di Lelio; Antonietta La Storia; Adriana Marinelli; Paola Varricchio; Eleonora Franzetti; Núria Banyuls; Gianluca Tettamanti; Morena Casartelli; Barbara Giordana; Juan Ferré; Silvia Gigliotti; Danilo Ercolini; Francesco Pennacchio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.