INTRODUCTION: Low bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with frailty assessed using performance-based measures. However, the latter can be cumbersome and difficult to standardize. We examined whether an easily obtained self-reported frailty measure also predicted low BMD. METHODS: In 230 elderly (82% female, 58% African-American), calcaneal BMD was measured by DXA and frailty evaluated using the VES-13 questionnaire. In addition to the original scoring, we developed a modified scoring system which provided a broader assessment of frailty and excluded age, which is a known independent predictor of BMD. A telephone interview conducted 6 years later ascertained interval fragility fractures and survival status. RESULTS: A higher modified frailty score was associated with lower BMD (p = 0.002), even after adjusting for age, weight, sex, and race and was more predictive of death at 6 years (p = 0.009) than the original score (p = 0.08). Based on our model, a subject with the highest frailty score differed from an otherwise similar subject with the lowest score by a calcaneal BMD of 1.4 T-score units, corresponding to 2-3 times higher fracture risk. CONCLUSION: Self-reported frailty is associated with low calcaneal BMD and can be used to identify subjects with a greater risk of osteoporosis than expected from traditional risk factors.
INTRODUCTION: Low bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with frailty assessed using performance-based measures. However, the latter can be cumbersome and difficult to standardize. We examined whether an easily obtained self-reported frailty measure also predicted low BMD. METHODS: In 230 elderly (82% female, 58% African-American), calcaneal BMD was measured by DXA and frailty evaluated using the VES-13 questionnaire. In addition to the original scoring, we developed a modified scoring system which provided a broader assessment of frailty and excluded age, which is a known independent predictor of BMD. A telephone interview conducted 6 years later ascertained interval fragility fractures and survival status. RESULTS: A higher modified frailty score was associated with lower BMD (p = 0.002), even after adjusting for age, weight, sex, and race and was more predictive of death at 6 years (p = 0.009) than the original score (p = 0.08). Based on our model, a subject with the highest frailty score differed from an otherwise similar subject with the lowest score by a calcaneal BMD of 1.4 T-score units, corresponding to 2-3 times higher fracture risk. CONCLUSION: Self-reported frailty is associated with low calcaneal BMD and can be used to identify subjects with a greater risk of osteoporosis than expected from traditional risk factors.
Authors: M C Nevitt; S R Cummings; W S Browner; D G Seeley; J A Cauley; T M Vogt; D M Black Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1992-03-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: A A Ismail; T W O'Neill; W Cockerill; J D Finn; J B Cannata; K Hoszowski; O Johnell; C Matthis; H Raspe; A Raspe; J Reeve; A J Silman Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2000 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Anne M Kenny; Ilana Y Waynik; JoAnne Smith; Richard Fortinsky; Alison Kleppinger; Daniel McGee Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dennis R Taaffe; Eleanor M Simonsick; Marjolein Visser; Stefano Volpato; Michael C Nevitt; Jane A Cauley; Frances A Tylavsky; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Zhao Chen; Charles Kooperberg; Mary B Pettinger; Tamsen Bassford; Jane A Cauley; Andrea Z LaCroix; Cora E Lewis; Simon Kipersztok; Carolyn Borne; Rebecca D Jackson Journal: Menopause Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Monica C Tembo; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Kara L Holloway-Kew; James Gaston; Sharon L Brennan-Olsen; Lana J Williams; Mark A Kotowicz; Julie A Pasco Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Michael J Cook; Alexander Oldroyd; Stephen R Pye; Kate A Ward; Evelien Gielen; Rathi Ravindrarajah; Judith E Adams; David M Lee; Gyorgy Bartfai; Steven Boonen; Felipe Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S Han; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Dirk Vanderschueren; Frederick C Wu; Terence W O'Neill Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Monica C Tembo; Kara L Holloway-Kew; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Sophia X Sui; Sarah M Hosking; Sharon L Brennan-Olsen; Lana J Williams; Mark A Kotowicz; Julie A Pasco Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Kim Bouillon; Mika Kivimaki; Mark Hamer; Severine Sabia; Eleonor I Fransson; Archana Singh-Manoux; Catharine R Gale; G David Batty Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 3.921