Literature DB >> 19291982

Threshold adjusted calcium scoring using CT is less susceptible to cardiac motion and more accurate.

J M Groen1, H Dijkstra, M J W Greuter, M Oudkerk.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate calcium scoring on computed tomography (CT) using an adjusted threshold depending on the maximum Hounsfield value within the calcification (HU(peak)). The volume of 19 calcifications was retrospectively determined on 64-slice multidetector CT and dual source CT (DSCT) at different thresholds and the threshold associated with the physical volume was determined. In addition, approximately 10 000 computer simulations were done simulating the same process for calcifications with mixed density. Using these data a relation between the HU(peak) and the threshold could be established. Hereafter, this relation was assessed by scanning six calcifications in a phantom at 40-110 beats per minute using DSCT. The influence of motion was determined and the measured calcium scores were compared to the physical volumes and mass. A positive linear correlation was found between the scoring threshold and the HU(peak) of the calcifications both for the phantom measurements as for the computer simulations. Using this relation the individual threshold for each calcification could be calculated. Calcium scores of the moving calcifications determined with an adjusted threshold were approximately 30% less susceptible to cardiac motion compared to standard calcium scoring. Furthermore, these scores approximated the physical volume and mass at least 10% better than the standard calcium scores. The threshold in calcium scoring should be adjusted for each individual calcification based on the HU(peak) of the calcification. Calcium scoring using an adjusted threshold is less susceptible to cardiac motion and more accurate compared to the physical values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291982     DOI: 10.1118/1.3049590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Generative models for reproducible coronary calcium scoring.

Authors:  Sanne G M van Velzen; Bob D de Vos; Julia M H Noothout; Helena M Verkooijen; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  CT attenuation values of blood and myocardium: rationale for accurate coronary artery calcifications detection with multi-detector CT.

Authors:  Salah D Qanadli; Anne-Marie Jouannic; Jamshid Dehmeshki; Tri-Linh Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Influence of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction on CT calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer dynamic phantom study.

Authors:  N R van der Werf; M J Willemink; T P Willems; M J W Greuter; T Leiner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Coronary calcium scoring with partial volume correction in anthropomorphic thorax phantom and screening chest CT images.

Authors:  Jurica Šprem; Bob D de Vos; Nikolas Lessmann; Robbert W van Hamersvelt; Marcel J W Greuter; Pim A de Jong; Tim Leiner; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Coronary calcium mass scores measured by identical 64-slice MDCT scanners are comparable: a cardiac phantom study.

Authors:  Hildebrand Dijkstra; Marcel J W Greuter; Jaap M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart-Proença; Klaasjan W K Renema; Frank de Lange; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.