Literature DB >> 19291805

Generation of digital phantoms of cell nuclei and simulation of image formation in 3D image cytometry.

David Svoboda1, Michal Kozubek, Stanislav Stejskal.   

Abstract

Image cytometry still faces the problem of the quality of cell image analysis results. Degradations caused by cell preparation, optics, and electronics considerably affect most 2D and 3D cell image data acquired using optical microscopy. That is why image processing algorithms applied to these data typically offer imprecise and unreliable results. As the ground truth for given image data is not available in most experiments, the outputs of different image analysis methods can be neither verified nor compared to each other. Some papers solve this problem partially with estimates of ground truth by experts in the field (biologists or physicians). However, in many cases, such a ground truth estimate is very subjective and strongly varies between different experts. To overcome these difficulties, we have created a toolbox that can generate 3D digital phantoms of specific cellular components along with their corresponding images degraded by specific optics and electronics. The user can then apply image analysis methods to such simulated image data. The analysis results (such as segmentation or measurement results) can be compared with ground truth derived from input object digital phantoms (or measurements on them). In this way, image analysis methods can be compared with each other and their quality (based on the difference from ground truth) can be computed. We have also evaluated the plausibility of the synthetic images, measured by their similarity to real image data. We have tested several similarity criteria such as visual comparison, intensity histograms, central moments, frequency analysis, entropy, and 3D Haralick features. The results indicate a high degree of similarity between real and simulated image data.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291805     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  25 in total

1.  CellOrganizer: Image-derived models of subcellular organization and protein distribution.

Authors:  Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.441

2.  SimuCell: a flexible framework for creating synthetic microscopy images.

Authors:  Satwik Rajaram; Benjamin Pavie; Nicholas E F Hac; Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Image-derived, three-dimensional generative models of cellular organization.

Authors:  Tao Peng; Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  Building cell models and simulations from microscope images.

Authors:  Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  Graph-regularized 3D shape reconstruction from highly anisotropic and noisy images.

Authors:  Christian Widmer; Stephanie Heinrich; Philipp Drewe; Xinghua Lou; Shefali Umrania; Gunnar Rätsch
Journal:  Signal Image Video Process       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Learning Generative Models of Tissue Organization with Supervised GANs.

Authors:  Ligong Han; Robert F Murphy; Deva Ramanan
Journal:  IEEE Winter Conf Appl Comput Vis       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 7.  Communicating subcellular distributions.

Authors:  Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Cell Membrane Tracking in Living Brain Tissue Using Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy.

Authors:  John Lee; Ilya Kolb; Craig R Forest; Christopher J Rozell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 10.856

9.  Inferring biological structures from super-resolution single molecule images using generative models.

Authors:  Suvrajit Maji; Marcel P Bruchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simulation of bright-field microscopy images depicting pap-smear specimen.

Authors:  Patrik Malm; Anders Brun; Ewert Bengtsson
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.