UNLABELLED: PET/CT imaging with (18)F-FDG has been used to detect inflammation in carotid and aortic plaque; its use in detecting coronary plaque has been limited by avid (18)F-FDG uptake by the myocardium. We investigated whether (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used to image inflammation in coronary arteries as a potential noninvasive method to detect vulnerable plaque. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 32 patients treated for malignancy who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and concomitant cardiac catheterization. As part of the recently described protocol, all patients were instructed to eat a low-carbohydrate, high-fat meal the night before and drink a vegetable oil drink the morning of the study. We reviewed the patients' baseline characteristics and their (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for adequacy of myocardial uptake suppression and correlated the presence of angiographically apparent plaque with (18)F-FDG uptake in the major coronary arteries. Two independent observers assessed the angiographic images and (18)F-FDG PET scans. RESULTS: A total of 95% of patients had 2 or more coronary disease risk factors, and 25% had unstable symptoms; 30% of index catheterizations resulted in intervention. In 20 of 32 patients (63%), myocardial suppression was good (12) or adequate (8). Inadequate suppression was due to self-reported dietary nonadherence. Patients with good, adequate, and poor suppression had maximal myocardial standardized uptake values of 2.8 +/- 0.7, 5.0 +/- 1.3, and 17.0 +/- 9.7, respectively. We identified (18)F-FDG uptake in 15 patients in 1 or more coronary segments. A trend to significance in correlation between presence of angiographic disease and signal in the vessel was observed (P = 0.07; 80 vessels examined). A total of 7 patients with significant coronary artery disease had aortic (18)F-FDG uptake. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we demonstrated the potential use of (18)F-FDG PET in imaging of inflammation in coronary arteries. The potential of (18)F-FDG PET is also being investigated in a prospective study.
UNLABELLED: PET/CT imaging with (18)F-FDG has been used to detect inflammation in carotid and aortic plaque; its use in detecting coronary plaque has been limited by avid (18)F-FDG uptake by the myocardium. We investigated whether (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used to image inflammation in coronary arteries as a potential noninvasive method to detect vulnerable plaque. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 32 patients treated for malignancy who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and concomitant cardiac catheterization. As part of the recently described protocol, all patients were instructed to eat a low-carbohydrate, high-fat meal the night before and drink a vegetable oil drink the morning of the study. We reviewed the patients' baseline characteristics and their (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for adequacy of myocardial uptake suppression and correlated the presence of angiographically apparent plaque with (18)F-FDG uptake in the major coronary arteries. Two independent observers assessed the angiographic images and (18)F-FDG PET scans. RESULTS: A total of 95% of patients had 2 or more coronary disease risk factors, and 25% had unstable symptoms; 30% of index catheterizations resulted in intervention. In 20 of 32 patients (63%), myocardial suppression was good (12) or adequate (8). Inadequate suppression was due to self-reported dietary nonadherence. Patients with good, adequate, and poor suppression had maximal myocardial standardized uptake values of 2.8 +/- 0.7, 5.0 +/- 1.3, and 17.0 +/- 9.7, respectively. We identified (18)F-FDG uptake in 15 patients in 1 or more coronary segments. A trend to significance in correlation between presence of angiographic disease and signal in the vessel was observed (P = 0.07; 80 vessels examined). A total of 7 patients with significant coronary artery disease had aortic (18)F-FDG uptake. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we demonstrated the potential use of (18)F-FDG PET in imaging of inflammation in coronary arteries. The potential of (18)F-FDG PET is also being investigated in a prospective study.
Authors: Jose J Rico-Jimenez; Michael J Serafino; Sebina Shrestha; Xi Chen; Wihan Kim; Jessie Adame; L Maximillan Buja; Deborah Vela; Brian E Applegate; Javier A Jo Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 5.162