Literature DB >> 19289420

18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT accurately localize pheochromocytomas.

Farzin Imani1, Vatche G Agopian, Martin S Auerbach, Martin A Walter, Firoozeh Imani, Matthias R Benz, Rebecca A Dumont, Chi Kien Lai, Johannes G Czernin, Michael W Yeh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Successful treatment of pheochromocytoma requires accurate diagnosis and localization of tumors. Herein, we investigated the accuracy of PET using 3,4-dihydroxy-6-(18)F-fluoro-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA), an amino acid transporter substrate, as an independent marker for detection of benign and malignant pheochromocytomas.
METHODS: The study comprised 25 consecutive patients (9 men, 16 women) whose median age was 51 y (range, 25-68 y), with known or suspected pheochromocytoma. Eleven patients underwent standardized (18)F-FDOPA PET and 14 patients underwent (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT studies, with a median of 511 MBq of (18)F-FDOPA (range, 206-625 MBq). Two readers, unaware of the reports of other imaging studies and clinical data, analyzed all scans visually and quantitatively (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and maximum transverse diameter). Histology and long-term clinical follow-up served as the gold standard. Correlation between SUVmax of tumors and biochemical markers was evaluated. SUVmax of the benign and malignant tumors was compared.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent surgery. Histology confirmed pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma in 11 cases (8 adrenal, including 2 malignant tumors, and 3 extraadrenal, including 1 malignant tumor). The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was established by follow-up in 2 additional patients (1 adrenal and 1 unknown location) and ruled out in 6 patients. Visual analysis detected and localized pheochromocytoma in 11 of 13 patients without false-positive results (sensitivity, 84.6%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 92%). These lesions had an SUVmax of 2.3-34.9 (median, 8.3). Evaluation of the false-negative cases revealed a 13 x 5 mm lesion with an SUVmax of 1.96 in 1 case; no lesion was localized in the second case using multiple additional modalities. Spearman nonparametric analysis did not show statistically significant correlation between SUVmax of the tumors and biochemical markers. The Mann-Whitney nonparametric test did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the SUVmax of (18)F-FDOPA in malignant and benign tumors.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT are highly sensitive and specific tools that can provide additional independent information for diagnosis and localization of benign and malignant pheochromocytomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19289420     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  Functional imaging in phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma with 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr 3-octreotide positron emission tomography and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine.

Authors:  Alexander Kroiss; Daniel Putzer; Christian Uprimny; Clemens Decristoforo; Michael Gabriel; Wolfram Santner; Christof Kranewitter; Boris Warwitz; Dietmar Waitz; Dorota Kendler; Irene Johanna Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  The incremental benefit of functional imaging in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan P Brito; Noor Asi; Michael R Gionfriddo; Catalina Norman; Aaron L Leppin; Claudia Zeballos-Palacios; Chaitanya Undavalli; Zhen Wang; Juan P Domecq; Gabriela Prustsky; Tarig A Elraiyah; Larry J Prokop; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Progress and challenges in neuroendocrine and neural crest tumours: molecular imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Novel use of F-DOPA PET/CT imaging in a child with paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel S Levine; Daniel L Metzger; Helen R Nadel; Angelica Oviedo; Michael J Adam; Erik Skarsgard
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05-13

Review 5.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: diagnosis, genetics, management, and treatment.

Authors:  Victoria L Martucci; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 6.  Malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Oliver Gimm; Catherine DeMicco; Aurel Perren; Francesco Giammarile; Martin K Walz; Laurent Brunaud
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Molecular imaging of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Clinical value of 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-DOPA PET/CT) for detecting pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Markus Luster; Wolfram Karges; Katrin Zeich; Sandra Pauls; Frederik A Verburg; Henning Dralle; Gerhard Glatting; Andreas K Buck; Christoph Solbach; Bernd Neumaier; Sven N Reske; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Comparison of 18F-fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose, and 18F-fluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the localization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Henri J L M Timmers; Clara C Chen; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Millie Whatley; Alexander Ling; Bastiaan Havekes; Graeme Eisenhofer; Lucia Martiniova; Karen T Adams; Karel Pacak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  EANM 2012 guidelines for radionuclide imaging of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  David Taïeb; Henri J Timmers; Elif Hindié; Benjamin A Guillet; Hartmut P Neumann; Martin K Walz; Giuseppe Opocher; Wouter W de Herder; Carsten C Boedeker; Ronald R de Krijger; Arturo Chiti; Adil Al-Nahhas; Karel Pacak; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.