Literature DB >> 19289266

Radiation dose predicts for biochemical control in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Alice Y Ho1, Ryan J Burri, Jamie A Cesaretti, Nelson N Stone, Richard G Stock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on freedom from biochemical failure (FFbF) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From a prospectively collected database of 2250 men treated at Mount Sinai Hospital from 1990 to 2004 with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer, 558 men with either one or more intermediate-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level 10-20 ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b) were identified who had a minimum follow-up of 24 months and postimplant CT-based dosimetric analysis. Biologically effective dose (BED) values were calculated to compare doses from different isotopes and treatment regimens. Patients were treated with brachytherapy with or without hormone therapy and/or external-beam radiotherapy. Patient- and treatment-related factors were analyzed with respect to FFbF. The median follow-up was 60 months (range, 24-167 months). Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix definition. Univariate analyses were used to determine whether any variable was predictive of FFbF. A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Overall, the actuarial FFbF at 10 years was 86%. Dose (BED <150 Gy(2) vs. >or=150 Gy(2)) was the only significant predictor of FFbF (p < 0.001). None of the other variables (PSA, external-beam radiotherapy, Gleason score, treatment type, hormones, stage, and number of risk factors) was found to be a statistically significant predictor of 10-year FFbF.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose is an important predictor of FFbF in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Treatment should continue to be individualized according to presenting disease characteristics until results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 0232 become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19289266     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Results from the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) survey: Evaluation of dosimetric outcomes for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Gil'ad N Cohen; Walter R Bosch; Lisa Morikawa; Najma Khalid; Cheryl L Crozier; W Robert Lee; Anthony Zietman; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Real-time intraoperative computed tomography assessment of quality of permanent interstitial seed implantation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Mick Worman; Gilad N Cohen; Xin Pei; Marisa Kollmeier; Josh Yamada; Brett Cox; Zhigang Zhang; Eva Bieniek; Lawrence Dauer; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Permanent interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with low risk prostate cancer: An interim analysis of 312 cases.

Authors:  Harun Badakhshi; Reinhold Graf; Volker Budach; Peter Wust
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Radical prostatectomy versus high dose permanent prostate brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds for patients with high risk prostate cancer: a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Dong Soo Park; In Hyuck Gong; Don Kyung Choi; Jin Ho Hwang; Hyun Soo Shin; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Use of androgen deprivation therapy with prostate brachytherapy-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  M Keyes; G Merrick; S J Frank; P Grimm; M J Zelefsky
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Update on prostate brachytherapy: long-term outcomes and treatment-related morbidity.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Jamie A Cesaretti; Nelson N Stone; Richard G Stock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Shiro Saito; Atsunori Yorozu; Shinsuke Kojima; Takashi Kikuchi; Satoshi Higashide; Manabu Aoki; Hirofumi Koga; Takefumi Satoh; Toshio Ohashi; Katsumasa Nakamura; Norihisa Katayama; Nobumichi Tanaka; Masahiro Nakano; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Prostate cancer with nodular bladder invasion (stage T4N1) cured by low-dose-rate brachytherapy with seminal vesicle implantation in combination with external beam radiotherapy of biologically effective dose ≥ 220 Gy: a case report.

Authors:  Keisei Okamoto
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-02-18

9.  High Intensity Focused Ultrasound versus Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Ksenija Limani; Alexandre Peltier; Quentin Marcelis; Marc Zanaty; Alexandre Chamoun; Marc Vanden Bossche; Thierry Roumeguère; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-08-19

10.  Comparison of permanent (125)I seeds implants with two different techniques in 500 cases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jose Luis Guinot; Jose Vicente Ricós; Maria Isabel Tortajada; Miguel Angel Santos; Juan Casanova; Jose Clemente; Josefa Samper; Paula Santamaría; Leoncio Arribas
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.