Literature DB >> 1928873

A theoretical comparison of electric and magnetic stimulation of the brain.

J M Saypol1, B J Roth, L G Cohen, M Hallett.   

Abstract

We present a theoretical comparison of the electric field produced in the brain by three modalities of transcranial stimulation of the cortex: magnetic stimulation, bifocal electric stimulation, and unifocal electric stimulation. The primary focus of this comparison is the focality and direction of the electric fields produced. A three-sphere model is used to represent the scalp, skull, and brain. All electric fields are calculated numerically. For magnetic stimulation we consider only a figure-of-eight coil. We find that magnetic stimulation produces the most focal field, while unifocal electric produces the least. Fields produced during magnetic stimulation are parallel to the head surface, while fields produced during electric stimulation have components both parallel and perpendicular to the head surface. The electric field produced by magnetic stimulation is shown to be insensitive to the skull conductivity, while that produced by electric stimulation is very sensitive to it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1928873     DOI: 10.1007/bf02584306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  20 in total

1.  The effect upon the threshold for nervous excitation of the length of nerve exposed, and the angle between current and nerve.

Authors:  W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1927-09-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Nervous propagation along 'central' motor pathways in intact man: characteristics of motor responses to 'bifocal' and 'unifocal' spine and scalp non-invasive stimulation.

Authors:  P M Rossini; M G Marciani; M Caramia; V Roma; F Zarola
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-10

3.  A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced by magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

Authors:  B J Roth; L G Cohen; M Hallett; W Friauf; P J Basser
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Methodology for non-invasive mapping of human motor cortex with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-05

5.  Magnetism. A new method for stimulation of nerve and brain.

Authors:  M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Projection from low-threshold muscle afferents of hand and forearm to area 3a of baboon's cortex.

Authors:  C G Phillips; T P Powell; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes.

Authors:  S Rush; D A Driscoll
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1968 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity.

Authors:  S Rush; D A Driscoll
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle.

Authors:  P A Merton; D K Hill; H B Morton; C D Marsden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems.

Authors:  R Plonsey; D B Heppner
Journal:  Bull Math Biophys       Date:  1967-12
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Improvement of depression following transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M S George; Z Nahas; F A Kozel; J Goldman; M Molloy; N Oliver
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Brain stimulation using electromagnetic sources: theoretical aspects.

Authors:  L Heller; D B van Hulsteyn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size.

Authors:  M Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Jen Scaturro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Tae-Seong Kim; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  S Groppa; A Oliviero; A Eisen; A Quartarone; L G Cohen; V Mall; A Kaelin-Lang; T Mima; S Rossi; G W Thickbroom; P M Rossini; U Ziemann; J Valls-Solé; H R Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.

Authors:  Dylan Edwards; Mar Cortes; Abhishek Datta; Preet Minhas; Eric M Wassermann; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by navigated mapping of optimal TMS current directions in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Jennifer M Perez; Jared C Horvath; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.