Literature DB >> 19287106

Does endoscopic ultrasound have anything to offer in the diagnosis of idiopathic acute pancreatitis?

Gareth Morris-Stiff1, Asmaa Al-Allak, Ben Frost, Wyn G Lewis, Malcolm C A Puntis, Ashley Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of EUS where other investigative techniques had failed to identify the cause of biochemically proven acute pancreatitis.
SETTING: All biliary EUS examinations performed between January 2000 and December 2004 were identified from the radiology computerised database. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients (25 male, 17 female; mean age: 53+/-3.2 years) with negative prior radiological investigations underwent EUS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prior and later radiological investigations, hospital readmission, and the need for further surgical intervention were also analysed.
RESULTS: EUS was normal in 17 patients (40.5%) and demonstrated signs of recent acute pancreatitis but no other aetiological factor in 8 patients (19.0%). Cholelithiasis or microlithiasis was identified in 9 patients (21.4%), combined gallstones/microlithiasis and choledocholithiasis in was seen in 6 patients (14.3%). In one patient (2.4%), calculi were seen in the common bile duct but not the gallbladder. In a further case with recurrent acute pancreatitis (2.4%), chronic pancreatitis was diagnosed on EUS. All patients with common bile duct stones underwent ERCP and sphincterotomy, and stones were universally confirmed. One patient with gallbladder calculi alone required an ERCP after developing jaundice whilst awaiting cholecystectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS provided additional diagnostic information in 17 of the 42 patients (40.5%). Moreover, exclusion of gallstones/microlithiais is also important as it facilitates a search for other causes of pancreatitis. In conclusion, most cases of cholelithiasis can be diagnosed with standard imaging modalities but when these fail to identify a cause, EUS has an important role to play.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19287106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JOP        ISSN: 1590-8577


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent and relapsing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Nalini M Guda; Joseph Romagnuolo; Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-04

2.  Endoscopic Ultrasound for Routine Assessment in Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ryan Pereira; Guy Eslick; Michael Cox
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Role of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography in 2010.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Pantelis S Karatzas; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Andreas Adler
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-10-16

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with first episode of idiopathic acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Anurag Govil; Mahendra Kumar Agrawal; Dinesh Agrawal; Harsh Udawat
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-17

Review 6.  Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis: Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Soumya Jagannath; Pramod Kumar Garg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

7.  Utility of endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis.

Authors:  Alejandra Tepox-Padrón; Rafael Ambrosio Bernal-Mendez; Gilberto Duarte-Medrano; Adriana Fabiola Romano-Munive; Milton Mairena-Valle; Miguel Ángel Ramírez-Luna; Jose Daniel Marroquin-Reyes; Luis Uscanga; Carlos Chan; Ismael Domínguez-Rosado; Jorge Hernandez-Calleros; Mario Pelaez-Luna; Felix Tellez-Avila
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01

8.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnostic work-up of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (PICUS): study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Devica S Umans; Hester C Timmerhuis; Nora D Hallensleben; Stefan A Bouwense; Marie-Paule Gf Anten; Abha Bhalla; Rina A Bijlsma; Marja A Boermeester; Menno A Brink; Lieke Hol; Marco J Bruno; Wouter L Curvers; Hendrik M van Dullemen; Brechje C van Eijck; G Willemien Erkelens; Paul Fockens; Erwin J M van Geenen; Wouter L Hazen; Chantal V Hoge; Akin Inderson; Liesbeth M Kager; Sjoerd D Kuiken; Lars E Perk; Jan-Werner Poley; Rutger Quispel; Tessa Eh Römkens; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Adriaan Citl Tan; Annemieke Y Thijssen; Niels G Venneman; Frank P Vleggaar; Annet McJ Voorburg; Roy Lj van Wanrooij; Ben J Witteman; Robert C Verdonk; Marc G Besselink; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.