Literature DB >> 19286266

Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Stuart J Johnstone1, Adam R Clarke.   

Abstract

While a response inhibition problem is well-established in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder of the combined subtype (AD/HDcom), the predominantly inattentive subtype (AD/HDin) has not been investigated previously. This study examined control versus subtype differences in visually evoked response inhibition using task performance and event-related potential (ERP) measures. Children with AD/HDcom (n=15) and AD/HDin (n=15) and age-matched controls (n=15) performed a cued visual Go/Nogo task requiring either activation or inhibition (30%) of a button-press response to the S2 (Go or Nogo stimulus) following the S1 (warning stimulus), presented 1380 ms earlier. Task performance and ERP indices of Warning, Go and Nogo stimulus processing, as well as preparation during the S1-S2 interval, were examined for group differences. Behavioural results indicated a response inhibition deficit in children with AD/HDcom and AD/HDin, with additional response activation problems in AD/HDcom. Topographic ERP differences between controls and both clinical groups suggested atypical (a) preparation for S2 as indexed by the late CNV, (b) early sensory/attentional processing of both S1 and S2, and (c) response inhibition as indexed by N2 and P3. In addition to replicating previous AD/HDcom findings, these results indicate that children with AD/HDin differ from controls in response preparation and inhibition during a cued visual Go/Nogo task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19286266     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  10 in total

1.  Event-related potential differences in children supplemented with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids during infancy.

Authors:  Ke Liao; Bruce D McCandliss; Susan E Carlson; John Colombo; D Jill Shaddy; Elizabeth H Kerling; Rebecca J Lepping; Wichian Sittiprapaporn; Carol L Cheatham; Kathleen M Gustafson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-10-16

2.  Chronic use of cannabis and poor neural efficiency in verbal memory ability.

Authors:  Robert A Battisti; Steven Roodenrys; Stuart J Johnstone; Colleen Respondek; Daniel F Hermens; Nadia Solowij
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes.

Authors:  Erik G Willcutt; Joel T Nigg; Bruce F Pennington; Mary V Solanto; Luis A Rohde; Rosemary Tannock; Sandra K Loo; Caryn L Carlson; Keith McBurnett; Benjamin B Lahey
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

4.  Stimulus-preceding negativity in ADHD.

Authors:  Rosa van Mourik; Tieme Janssen; Jaap Oosterlaan
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  What Has Been Learned from Using EEG Methods in Research of ADHD?

Authors:  Gráinne McLoughlin; Máté Gyurkovics; Ümit Aydin
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

6.  Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system.

Authors:  Gian Candrian; Juri D Kropotov; Valery A Ponomarev; Gian-Marco Baschera; Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

7.  The effects of methylphenidate on cerebral activations to salient stimuli in healthy adults.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Sien Hu; David Matuskey; Sheng Zhang; Osama Abdelghany; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Discriminating between ADHD adults and controls using independent ERP components and a support vector machine: a validation study.

Authors:  Gian Candrian; Venke Arntsberg Grane; Juri D Kropotov; Valery A Ponomarev; Gian-Marco Baschera; Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2011-07-19

9.  Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes-A Need to Change Perspectives.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Differences in the performance of NK1R-/- ('knockout') and wildtype mice in the 5‑Choice Continuous Performance Test.

Authors:  Ashley J Porter; Katharine Pillidge; S Clare Stanford; Jared W Young
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.