Literature DB >> 19285140

Electromagnetic responses to invisible face stimuli during binocular suppression.

Philipp Sterzer1, Lauri Jalkanen, Geraint Rees.   

Abstract

When two incompatible monocular images compete for perceptual dominance, one can dominate awareness while the other is suppressed and invisible. It has been suggested that binocular suppression of this kind involves competitive neuronal interactions at multiple levels of the visual processing hierarchy. Here we asked whether in such situations, complex stimulus information is still preserved at advanced visual processing stages despite competitive interactions at early levels of the visual system. We tested whether face stimuli made invisible through binocular suppression would evoke category-specific responses in the human brain, using magnetoencephalography. During scanning participants were presented with face or house stimuli that were either visible or rendered invisible using continuous flash suppression (CFS). Online behavioural assessment with a two-alternative forced choice task confirmed that participants were neither able to detect target stimuli on CFS trials nor to correctly classify the stimuli as faces or houses. Even though the amplitude of the M170, a well-established face-specific signal, was strongly reduced by CFS, there was still a significantly greater signal in response to invisible face compared to invisible house stimuli at the latency and the location of the M170 to visible stimuli. Thus, visual object stimuli undergo category-specific processing in the ventral visual pathway even when profoundly suppressed from awareness by binocular competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285140     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Variability of perceptual multistability: from brain state to individual trait.

Authors:  Andreas Kleinschmidt; Philipp Sterzer; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Dissociating conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Amygdala responsivity to high-level social information from unseen faces.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Ryan M Stolier; Zachary A Ingbretsen; Eric A Hehman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Noise in brain activity engenders perception and influences discrimination sensitivity.

Authors:  Fosco Bernasconi; Marzia De Lucia; Athina Tzovara; Aurelie L Manuel; Micah M Murray; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Conscious awareness is necessary for processing race and gender information from faces.

Authors:  Ido Amihai; Leon Deouell; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-09-16

7.  Continuous flash suppression modulates cortical activity in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Eye contact facilitates awareness of faces during interocular suppression.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Atsushi Senju; Marius V Peelen; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 9.  Blindsight and Unconscious Vision: What They Teach Us about the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Sara Ajina; Holly Bridge
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  Unconscious evaluation of faces on social dimensions.

Authors:  Lorna H Stewart; Sara Ajina; Spas Getov; Bahador Bahrami; Alexander Todorov; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.